S. Mahunka szerk.: Folia Entomologica Hungarica 62. (Budapest, 2001)

labels: NP: Nemzeti Park [National Park], TK: Tájvédelmi Körzet [Landscape Protected Area], TT: Természetvédelmi Terület [Nature Reserve], hg, hegys.: hegység [mountains]; p.: patak [brook]; v.: völgy [valley]. Hand-written texts are given in quotation marks. PLATYPEZIDAE Microsania collarti Chandler in Vanhara, 1982 — 1 female: Bugac, Kisbugac, 1988. VII. 5, leg. Hevér T. - The genus and the species are new for the fauna of Hungary, as well as this is the first representative of the subfamily Microsaniinae in our country. PHORIDAE Menozziola schmitzi (Menozzi, 1921) — 1 male: Csévharaszt, 2000. 06. 10, leg. Papp L. - We would rather regard this as the first reliable record of the species and genus from Hungary: Schmitz published it (1928: 141) as "It Fiume U". Even if "U" meant a locality other than Fiume, nobody can define that locality, since the specimen(s) perished in the fire of 1956. Tubicera lichtwardti Schmitz, 1920 — 1 male: Pécs, fcs. fénycsapda, light trap, 1958, VI. 9. on the reverse side: "Dr. Weber". - Schmitz (1924: 83) published it from Gyón, but that specimen was annihilated in the fire in the FINHM in 1956. Disney (1991) listed it from Spain, France and Hungary. STRONGYLOPHTHALMYIIDAE Strongylophthalmyia ustulata (Zetterstedt, 1847) — 1 female: Verőcemaros, Magyarkút, almacsalétek [apple bait], 1988. aug. 22, leg. Papp László. - This specimen was captured while collecting drosophilids in low mountain brook valleys on apple baits. It was among the non-drosophilid specimens which were put into alcohol, pinned ca. two years ago and labelled afterwards. The specimen was found during the work of selecting unsorted materials into families. SEPSIDAE Sepsis nigripes Meigen, 1826 — 1 male, 1 female: Hejőbába, 1964. V. 14, leg. Tóth S. - First Hungarian record. Soós (1959) keyed it as a species expected to occur in Hungary. It is a rare species, whose status was sometime debated. I prepared the genitalia of the male: its surstylus is quite the same as Hcnnig's (1949) figure of the male surstylus (Tafel V, Fig. 73). The shape and armature of fore femur and tibia are also the same as in Hennig.