Folia archeologica 27.

István Ecsedy: Két neolitikus idol Kelet-Magyarországról

Two NEOLITHIC IDOLS 45 Fig. 2a. Neolithic idol. Environments of Körösladány 2a. ábra. Újkőkori idol. Körösladány környéke of Sarovce,

1

2 mentioned also by J. Korek, and of Tószeg-Kucorgó.

1:

1 A close analogy is the flat idol found at the Bükk site of Lastovce. On its front side the dress is indicated by an incised net pattern, on the rear side we find irregular incisions, the pubic triangle is incised superficially in the centre of the base.

14 The above mentioned analogies to the two idols, published here, are to be classed partly among the Bükk culture; in the earlier stages of archaeological research interactions of the Bükk and Tisza cultures were mentioned in connection with these finds.

1

3 Recent results of Neolithic research in Hungary have, however, modified these statements. It became clear that while there is an evident synchronism among the Bükk culture and the late groups of the Alföld Linear Pottery, as the Tiszadob, Szilmeg and Szakáihát groups, the development of the 1

2 Novotnj, В., Slovensko v mladsej doby kamennej. (Bratislava 1958) PI. XXV. 2.; Korek, J., op. cit. 17-18.; Höckmann, О., Idolplastik . . . 24.; Licbardtis, ]., loc. cit. 1

3 Korek, ]., op. cit. 17., Figs. 4: 5-6. According to Korek it is a piece which might be placed equally among the products of the Bükk or the Tisza cultures. According to Höckmann it is dubious whether the find could be regarded as the fragment of an idol at all. Höckmann, О., Idolplastik ... 25. 1

4 Viadal, J., Nález bukohovorského idolu na neolitickom sídlisko v Lastovciach. ArRoz 16(1964) 427-432., Fig. 136. 1

5 Csalog, ]., FA 3-4(1941) 17-27.; Csalog, ]., FA 7(1955) 36-37.; Korek, ]., op. cit. 18-20.; Cf. Csalog, /., Arch.Ért. 87(1960) 188-189.; Höckmann, О., Idolplastik . . . 15-16.