Fogorvosi szemle, 2020 (113. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)

2020-06-01 / 2. szám

FOGORVOSI SZEMLE

113. évf. 2. sz. 2020.n

50

Irodalom

1. bergluNDh T, liNDhe J: Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol

. 1996 Oct; 23 (10): 971–

973. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00520.x

2. hermaNN Js, buser D, sCheNK rK, higgiNboTTom Fl, CoChraN Dl: Biologic width around titanium implants. A physiologically formed and stable dimension over time. Clin Oral Implants Res.

2000 Feb; 11 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001001.x

3. smuKler h, CasTelluCCi F, CaPri D: The role of the implant housing in obtaining aesthetics: generation of peri-implant gingivae and papillae Part 1. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent.

2003 Mar; 15 (2): 141–

149; quiz 150. Review.

4. POLIZZI G, GRUNDER U, GOENÉ R, HATANO N, HENRY P, JACKSON WJ, et al: Immediate and delayed implant placement into extraction sockets: A 5-year report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.

2000; 2 (2): 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00111.x

5. CoChraN Dl, morToN D, Weber hP: Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols for endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.

2004; 19 (suppl): 109–113.

6. Chee WW, DoNovaN Te: Treatment planning and soft tissue management for optimal implant aesthetics. Ann Acad Med Singapore.

1995; 24 (1): 113–117.

7. su h, goNzalez-marTiN o, WeisgolD a, lee e: Considerations of implant abutment and crown contour: critical contour and subcritical contour. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent.

2010; 30 (4): 335–343.

8. bishTi, s., J. r. sTrub aND W. aTT: Effect of the implant-abutment interface on peri-implant tissues: a systematic review. Acta Od ontol Scand. 2014; 72 (1): 13–25. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357

.2013.799712

9. sTeigmaNN m, moNJe a, ChaN hl, WaNg hl: Emergence profile design based on implant position in the esthetic zone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014; 34 (4): 559–563. https://doi.org/

10.11607/prd.2016

10. HENSTEN-PETTERSEN A

. Skin and mucosal reactions associated with dental materials. Eur J Oral Sci.

1998; 106 (2 Pt 2): 707–712.

11. muNKsgaarD eC, PeuTzFelDT a, asmusseN e: Elution of TEGDMA and BisGMA from a resin and a resin composite cured with halogen or plasma light. Eur J Oral Sci.

2000; 108 (4): 341–345. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.108004341.x

12. KAN J, ROE P, RUNCHARASSAENG K, PATEL R, WAKI T, LOZADA J, ZIM-mermaN g: Classification of Sagittal Root Position in Relation to the Anterior Maxillary Osseous Housing for Immediate Implant Placement: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2011; 26. 873–876.

13. Kois JC: Predictable single-tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent.

2004 Nov; 25 (11): 895–896., 898., 900.

14. esPosiTo m, grusoviN mg, CoulTharD P, WorThiNgToN hv: Different loading strategies of dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled clinical trials. Eur J Oral Implan

tol. 2008 Winter; 1 (4): 259–276. Review.

15. hiNDs KF: Custom impression coping for an exact registra-tion of the healed tissue in the esthetic implant restoration. Int J Peri

odont Rest Dent. 1997; 17: 585–591.

9. kép: A: Az implantáció utáni kontroll röntgenfelvétel, B: 2 hónappal a műtét után, C: 6 hónappal a végleges korona átadása után, D: 2,5 évvel a végleges korona átadása után