Fogorvosi szemle, 2020 (113. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)

2020-03-01 / 1. szám

FOGORVOSI SZEMLE

113. évf. 1. sz. 2020.n

30

MaraDa gy, baráTH Z, borbéLy j, HerMaNN P, raDiCs T, raDNai M, HegeDűs Cs

Classification Possibilities of the Partially Edentulous Dental Arches in the Past and Today

Different classification systems for partial edentulism have been developed to facilitate and standardize prosthetic care. Their basic concepts reflect the up-to-date dental materials and supply policies of the era. The different classification systems had many advantageous properties, but none of them was able to fulfill their requirements.

According to the current approach, the first published classification form was based on the usage of removable partial dentures. Shortly afterwards, Edward Kennedy has created his most commonly used classification system, based on the incidence of individual partial edentulism. A number of excellent dentists have developed a primarily practical-oriented scheme adapted to domestic circumstances, among them the work of Lőrinczy and Földvári, Fábián and Fejérdy should be highlighted.

Considering the weaknesses of the previous systems, the American College of Prosthodontists has developed an entirely new system. Their goal was to provide a therapeutic guideline to the practitioner in accordance with the up-to-date care principles. Depending on the complexity of their care, the classification is based on the characteristics of the ridge, the edentulous area, status of the abutment teeth, and the occlusion.

Keywords: jaw, edentulous, partially, classification

Anyagi támogatás:

A közlemény megírása, illetve a kapcsolódó kutatómunka anyagi támogatásban nem részesült.

Szerzői munkamegosztás:

MGy: kézirat megszövegezése

BZ: kézirat szerkesztése

BJ: kézirat megszövegezése, korrekciója

HP: kézirat megszövegezése, korrekciója

RT: kézirat véleményezése

RM: kézirat megszövegezése, korrekciója

HCs: kézirat ellenőrzése, korrekciója

A cikk végleges változatát valamennyi szerző elolvasta és jóváhagyta.

Irodalom

1. APPLEGATE OC: An evaluation of the support for the removable partial denture. J Prosthet Dent.

1960; 10: 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/

0022-3913(60)90096-2

2. ARLIN ML: Dental implants and the partially edentulous patient. Diagnosis and treatment planning. Oral Health.

1989; 79: 19–21.

3. BEN-UR Z, SHIFMAN BZ, AVIV I: Further aspects of design for distal extension removable partial dentures based on the Kennedy classification. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26: 165–169. https://doi.org/10.

1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00344.x

4. CULPEPPER WD, MOULTON PS: Considerations in fixed prosthodontics. Dent Clin North Am.

1979; 23: 21–35.

5. DEVAN MM: The nature of the partial denture foundation: Suggestions for its preservation. J Prosthet Dent.

1951; 2: 210–218. https://

doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(52)90048-6

6. DEVLIN H: Replacement of missing molar teeth. A prosthodontic dilemma. Br Dent

J.

1994; 176: 31–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808354

7. DIBAI N, MECHANIC E: Prosthodontic treatment for the complex mandibular Class I partially edentulous patient. J Dent Que.

1980; 17: 63–65.

8. GOLDBERG PV: Retention of teeth and placement of implantsin the partially edentulous maxilla: the decision-making process. Dent Implantol Update. 1995; 6: 9–13.

9. IHDE SK: Fixed prosthodontics in skeletal Class III patients with partially edentulous jaws and age-related prognathism: The basal osseointegration procedure. Implant Dent.

1999; 8: 241–246.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199903000-00005

10. KELLY E: Changes caused by a mandibular removable partial denture opposing a maxillary complete denture. J Prosthet Dent.

1972; 27: 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90190-4

11. LANEY WR, DESJARDINS RP: Surgical preparation of the partially edentulous patient. Dent Clin North Am. 1973; 17: 611–630.

12. MCGARRY TJ, EDGE MJ, GILLIS RE, HILSEN KL, JONES RE, SHIPMAN B, et al: Parameters of Care for the American College of Prosthodontists. J Prosthodont.

1996; 5: 3–71.

13. MCGARRY TJ, NIMMO A, SKIBA JF, AHLSTROM RH, SMITH CR, KOUMIJAN JH, et al: Classification System for Partial Edentulism. J Pros

thodont. 2002 Sep; 11 (3): 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpro.

2002.126094

14. MCGARRY TJ, NIMMO A, SKIBA JF, et al: Classification system for complete edentulism. J Prosthodont. 1999; 8: 27–39. https://doi.

org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1999.tb00005.x

15. MEHTA JD, JOGLEKAR AP: Vertical jaw relations as a factor in partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent.

1969; 21: 618–625. https://doi.org/10.

1016/0022-3913(69)90009-2

16. MISCH CE, JUDY KW: Classification of partially edentulous arches for implant dentistry. Int J Oral Implantol.

1987; 4: 7–13.

17. PEKKARINEN V, YLI-URPO A: Dysfunction of the masticatory system and the mutilated dental arch: Anamnestic index, dysfunction index and occlusal index before restorative and prosthetic treatment. Proc Finn Dent Soc.

1984; 80: 73–79.

18. REYNOLDS JM: Abutment selection for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1968; 19: 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913

(68)90064-4

19. SABRI R: Management of missing maxillary lateral incisors. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999; 130: 80–84. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.

archive.1999.0032

20. SAUNDERS TR, GILLIS RE JR, DESJARDINS RP: The maxillary complete denture opposing the mandibular bilateral distalextension partial denture: Treatment considerations. J Prosthet Den.t

1979; 41: 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90292-0

21. TURNER CH, RITCHIE GM: The problems of maxillary complete dentures opposed by retained mandibular incisor and canine teeth (I). Quintessence Int. 1978; 9: 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(78)90022-2

22. WILLARSON KL: Removable partial denture prosthesis for the periodontal patient. The current status–an option. Dent Clin North Am.

1969; 13: 263–279.

23. ZARB GA, MACKAY HF: The partially edentulous patient. I. The biologic price of prosthodontic intervention. Aust Dent J.

1980; 25: 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1980.tb03676.x

Review