Fogorvosi szemle, 2016 (109. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)

2016-03-01 / 1. szám

14 FOGORVOSI SZEMLE ■ 109. évf. 1. sz. 2016. Gingivális indexek összehasonlítása (2.2 eredmények) X. táblázat Powered Manual Std. Mean Difference Std. Mean Difference Study or Subgroup Mean SD Total Mean SD Total Weight 2.2.1 Loe & Silness Gl Aass & Gjermo 2000 1,215 0,135 50 1,19 0,11 50 13,8% Heasman 1999 1,55 0,21 25 1,64 0,22 24 12,4% Stoltze & Bay 1994 0,9 0,045 20 1,1 0,085 18 9,2% Subtotal (95% Cl) 95 92 35,4% Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 1,54; Chi2 : = 36,21, df = 2 (P< 0,00001); I2 = 94% Test for overall effect: Z = 1,32 (P = 0,19) 2.2.2 Lobene mod. Gl Van der Weijden 1994 0,8 0,24 42 0,94 0,26 35 13,3% Subtotal (95% Cl) 42 35 13,3% Heterogeneity: Not applicable Test for overall effect: Z = 2,38 (P = 0,02) 2.2.3 BOP (Ainamo & Bay) Dentino 2002 0,134 0,092 76 0,155 0,094 81 14,4% Mantokoudis 2001 0,24 0,244 24 0,243 0,244 24 12,4% Subtotal (95% Cl) 100 105 26,8% Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0,00; Chi2 = 0,41, df = 1 (P = 0,52); I2 = 0% Test for overall effect: Z = 1,25 (P = 0,21 ) 2.2.4 BOMP (van der Weijden) Rosema 2008 0,57 0,36 37 0,61 0,285 39 13,4% Subtotal (95% Cl) 37 39 13,4% Heterogeneity: Not applicable Test for overall effect: Z = 0,53 (P = 0,59) 2.2.5 Papillary Bl (Mühlemann) McCracken 2004 0,97 0,2742 16 0,77 0,2742 16 11,1% Subtotal (95% Cl) 16 16 11,1% Heterogeneity: Not applicable Test for overall effect: Z = 1,94 (P = 0,05) Total (95% Cl) 290 287 100,0% Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0,34; Chi2 = 45,74, df = 7 (P < 0,00001); I2 = 85% Test for overall effect: Z = 1,47 (P = 0,14) Test for subgroup differences: Chi2 = 9,74, df = 4 (P = 0,04), I2 = 58,9% IV, Random, 95% Cl IV, Random, 95% Cl 0,20 [-0,19, 0,59] -0,41 [-0,98, 0,15] -2,93 [-3,87, -1,98] -0,98 [-2,44, 0,48]-0,56 [-1,01,-0,10] -0,56 [-1,01,-0,10] ♦-0,22 [-0,54, 0,09] -0,01 [-0,58, 0,55] -0,17 [-0,45, 0,10] i-0,12 [-0,57, 0,33] -0,12 [-0,57, 0,33] 0,71 [-0,01, 1,43] 0,71 [-0,01, 1,43]-0,34 [-0,79, 0,11] ♦-4-2 0 2 4 Favours powered Favours manual

Next

/
Oldalképek
Tartalom