Fogorvosi szemle, 2016 (109. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)
2016-03-01 / 1. szám
12 FOGORVOSI SZEMLE ■ 109. évf. 1. sz. 2016. Fogkő indexek összehasonlítása (1.3 eredmények) VI. táblázat Powered Manual Std. Mean Difference Study or Subgroup Mean SD Total Mean SD Total Weight IV, Random, 95% Cl 1.3.1 Calculus Index (Volpe-Manhold) Dentino 2002 0,906 0,92 76 1,33 1,05 81 68,0%-0,43 [-0,74,-0,11] Van der Weijden 1994 • 0,2 0,21 42 0,25 0,2 32 32,0%-0,24 [-0,70 , 0,22] Subtotal (95% Cl) 118 113 100,0%-0,37 [-0,63,-0,11] Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0,00; Chi2 = = 0,42, df = 1 (P = 0,51); l2 = = 0% Test for overall effect: Z = 2,75 (P = 0,006) Total (95% Cl) 118 113 100,0%-0,37 [-0,63,-0,11] Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0,00; Chi2 = = 0,42, df = 1 (P = 0,51); l2 = = 0% Test for overall effect: Z = 2,75 (P = 0,006) Std. Mean Difference IV, Random, 95% Cl + Test for subgroup differences: Not applicable-4 -2 0 2 4 Favours powered Favours manual Biztonságosság (1.4 eredmények) VII. táblázat Powered Manual Std. Mean Difference Study or Subgroup Mean SD Total Mean SD Total Weight IV, Random, 95% Cl Std. Mean Difference IV, Random, 95% Cl 1.4.1 Gingival recession (mm) Dentino 2002 1,2 0,58 Subtotal (95% Cl) Heterogeneity: Not applicable Test for overall effect: Z = 2,96 (P = 0,003) 1.4.2 Gingival abrasion score (Danser) 76 76 1,46 0,5 81 81 46,9% 46,9% Mantokoudis 2001 11,645 5,073 24 12,17 5,01 24 22,1% Rosema 2008 6,7 6,14 37 6,91 5,61 39 30,9% Subtotal (95% Cl) 61 63 53,1% Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0,00; Chi2 = 0,03, df = 1 (P = 0,86); I2 = 0% Test for overall effect: Z = 0,34 (P = 0,73) Total (95% Cl) 137 144 100,0% Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0,02; Chi2 = 3,01, df = 2 (P = 0,22); I2 = 34% Test for overall effect: Z = 1,67 (P = 0,10) Test for subgroup differences: Chi2 = 2,98, df = 1 (P = 0,08), I2 = 66,4%-0,48 [-0,80, -0,16] -0,48 [-0,80, -0,16]-0,10 [-0,67, 0,46] -0,04 [-0,49, 0,41] -0,06 [-0,41, 0,29]-0,26 [-0,56, 0,05] I--------1---------4 -2 0 2 4 Favours powered Favours manual
