Szittyakürt, 1980 (19. évfolyam, 1-12. szám)

1980-11-01 / 11-12. szám

Page 2 MARCH 1980 thus total puppets of the Super­powers? Will the U.S. foreign policy quickly return to detente after the carve up of the Middle East? There are many more unanswered questions. One thing is certain if the 1975 intelligence report is correct, it makes no difference whether the Soviets have any American wheat in tagonize the Soviets, I didn’t sus­pect how quickly events would prove me a prophet,” Zia Khan recalled. “Now let me tell you,” Zia Khan revealed, “the hidden background of my earlier remarks. I had visited Washington last March, to brief the Senate Foreign Relations Com­mittee headed by Sen. Frank Lake County Edition The Cleveland Press Home Friday. January 31. 1975 Plan to carve up Middle East is reported if war breaks out By CHAPMAN PINCHER Preis-London Express Wrller LONDON — The United States and Russia are believ­­ed to have reached a secret understand^ on a political cane up of the Middle East if the Arabs and Israelis Tnis is the belief of senior Rritish Government offi­cials alter studying intelligence reports. They suspect that the knowledge of this by Egypt's President Anwar Sadat. King Faisal of Saudi Arabia and other Arab leaders is the reason these leaders are now insisting there must he a peaceful selllement with Israel The alternative could lie ihat they would all lose their independence Intelligence chiefs here are convinced Ihat when President Ford and Soviet leader Leonid Brtzhnev met in Vladivostok two months ago they agreed that any further Arab-lsraeli war which could bring them into confrontation was against both their interests and would have to be slopped. The "scenario' built up by intelligence experts sug­gests that In Ihe interests of world peace the United Stales would take over political control of Saudi Arabia. Libya. Kuwait and possibly some Persian Gulf stales, thereby ensuring Western oil supplies. The Soviet Union's share would lie firm political control over Iraq. Syria and Iran, which would be the richest Sonet prize Israel and Egypt would be demilitarized. Contingency plans for any military operillons requlr­warnlng that Ihr l nltrd Stairs would not prrmil Its Industry to be strangled by another oil embargo. This new urgency to maintain peace in Ihe Middle East is Ihe likeliest explanation for Ihe Shah of Iran's diplomatic moves. He ts promising to supply oil to the Israelis il they hand back Ihe Egyptian oil wells in occupied Sinai and loosening hi> military and intelli­gence ties with Israel The existence of am- such underslandmg is certain to be denied by both Washington and Moscow. Any U S. be particularly embarrassing to Washington. their bellies or not, the Afghan people will follow the same fate as the Hungarians did in 1956, as a result of covert U.S. support of the Soviet empire. When the Soviets have invaded Afghanistan President Carter ap­peared stunned, yet when the leader of the Afghan anti-communist for­ces came to Washington a year ago to warn the administration of his country’s peril, he was told the U.S. would take no action that would offend the Soviets and jeopardize SALT II. This incident was docu­mented by Terry Dobbs in Ame­rica’s most informative political publication the SPOTLIGHT. In an exclusive interview to SPOTLIGHT Zia Khan the chairman of the Afghan Islamic National Revolu-ZIA KHAN NASSRY tionary Committee and a top mili­tary leader gave the following com­ments: “I have conferred with Secretary- General Kurt Waldheim and other senior United Nations officials in New York. And my schedule for the next few days includes meetings with President Sadat of Egypt and other statesmen. “The one world leader who still seems reluctant to confront the con­sequences of the Afghan crisis is Jimmy Carter,” he said. “No wonder; he has ignored every warn­ing, including mine, in favor of ap­peasing the Soviet Union and must now deal with the ruins of some dis­astrous and deluded policies.” “When, in our first talk last No­vember, I criticized the Carter ad­ministration for basing its whole foreign strategy on only two pillars —Israel and Russia—for being con­cerned only with the need to be­friend the Zionists and not to an­Church (D-Idaho), the State De­partment and some military experts on the desperate emergency in Af­ghanistan. I received no encourage­ment of any kind for our unyielding anti-communist struggle, not even a distant promise of support.” The Afghan national chairman, leader of what was then, and still remains, the world’s most com­mitted, militant and courageous anti-Soviet resistance movement, met only cold indifference in his talks with Washington officials. “When I finally burst out and accused a senior State Department official of betraying America’s own political philosophy and those of us who were fighting for it, gun in hand, in faraway Afghanistan, I was told that President Carter wanted to do nothing that might disturb the Russians and perhaps even jeo­pardize the SALT treaty,” Zia Khan disclosed. “One American diplomat told me that the Soviet Union was committed not to launch ‘open in­tervention’ in Afghanistan unless the U.S. helped our fight for freedom. That was proven a lie, and it has shown U.S. foreign policy to be based, not just on communist lies, but on the penchant of Ame­rican officials to lie to themselves.” The SPOTLIGHT report also gives an account what some foreign correspondents and diplomats had to say about the U.S. response toward Afghanistan: “. . . . America’s abandonment of the Afghan struggle for independ­ence from Soviet domination has been a shameful and, as it turns out, stupid act of self-betrayal,” a West German editor, dean of the foreign correspondents’ corps based in New York, told the SPOTLIGHT “To refuse help to a strong democ­ratic movement, such as Zia Khan’s forces in Afghanistan, does not prevent Soviet interventions, as Carter seems to have hoped. To the contrary: It encourages communist aggression, because it gives Moscow the idea it is free to do as it pleases.” “Carter may not have been stupid,” a french diplomatic ob­server assigned to a UN economic research unit speculated. “The problem may be precisely that Zia Khan was right: The White House cares only for pleasing Israel and keeping its backstage deals with the Soviets going. In that case, the bloody invasion and brutal repres­sion of Afghanistan may prove a useful crisis to facilitate what the administarion wants to do: increase the billions of aid poured into Israel’s corruption-ridden and fal­tering economy under pretext of the world ‘emergency’ while learning the embattled Afghans to fend off the tide of Soviet armored troops with nothing but their ancient Lee- Enfield rifles and their will to resist to the last. “Thus,” he said, “Moscow gets to do what it wants—butcher the na­tionalists of Afghanistan—and Wa­shington gets to do what it wants: slip Israel another billion or so under the pretext of confidential ‘emergency assistance.’ Everybody is happy except of course the abandoned Afghans—who will now be tested in the crucible of a real holocaust—and the American wage­­earner, who must subsidize these devious and deceptive foreign-af­fairs follies.” The Soviet invasion of Afghan­istan has other side effects that are beneficial for the Carter administ­ration. This year is election year. With the hostage crisis in Iran, and the Soviets in Afghanistan President Carter has a viable excuse to avoid campaigning and debating his chal­lengers. The administration will also have an easy time to get all kinds of money for military expen­ditures, to replace obsolete hard­ware and equipment that has been given to Israel for security reasons. It is only too logical to ask how long are the American People going to sacrafice their fruits of labor to subsidize a devious foreign policy that keeps the Soviet empire alive? When is the U.S. going to have an administration that will declaire a counterrevolution against the Soviet empire? A victory without war? When is the U.S. going to support all anti-Soviet movements around the world? If the United States was willing to take a stand millions inside the Soviet Union, millions in Eastern Europe would rally against this colonial empire. But the U.S. Government does not support such a positive program. They have been discouraging all European refugees to be anti-Soviet, for the past 25 years. We were the best ally they ever had. They did not want us. They will loose the few they have left.----------------------------------------— Who are the victims of the Grain Embargo? According to the CIA the US grain embargo against the Soviets will set their diet back a decade. The Russians will have to cut back their herds which will result in meet shortage. Apparently the CIA did not learn it in 60 years that when the pie gets smaller in the Soviet empire people supplement their diets with whatever is available. If anyone will suffer from the grainembargo, that will be the US farmers and the Eastern European satellites who will have to help out the big brother, otherwise he will shot off the “friendship” pipelines of gas, oil etc. Good luck CIA try again! ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ WHERE THERE IS NO VISION... Recently the HFFM expressed the concern of all peace loving Hun­garians for the Soviet rape of AF­GHANISTAN. The following MAILGRAM to US President, JAMES CARTER and LETTER to US Ambassador to the UN., D. F. McHENRY, clearly spelled out the displeasure of the REVOLUTIONARY COUNCIL of The Hungarian Freedomfighter Movement for the continued West­ern, but more precisely for the US. support, of the Godless Soviets in­spite of the Soviet’s repetitions viola­tion of other people’s human rights and national territorial integrity. * Ironically the Russians attacked their Southern-Asian neighbor on the same day in 1979 as they did HUNGARY in 1956: both of these countries were forcefully entered on NOVEMBER 4th!...............what a Christmas surprise for the Western­­world?! . . . MAILGRAM service center MIDDLETOWN, VA, 22645 vfkl I "> fUM, Sä Mailgram ('S. 4.0166213041002 02/1 /30 ICS IPMBNGZ CSP PGHB 1 8142266952 MGM TDBN CLARION PA 02-10 1126P E3T THIS MAILGRAM IS A CONFIRMATION COPY OF THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE I 6142266952 MGM TDBN CLARION PA 220 02-10 1126P EST ZIP PRESIDENT JAMES E CARTER WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC 20500 MR PRESIDENT, A LONG TIME AGO, IT WAS SAID "WHERE THERE IS NO VISION THE PEOPLE SHALL PERISH," in 1956 THE U.S. PRESIDENT REFUSED TO INVISION THE SERIOUSNESS OF SOVIET INTENTIONS ALL OVER THE WORLD, BUT PARTICULARLY IN THE ANCIENT LAND OF HUNGARY, THE ATHEISTIC SOVIET IMPERIALISTS RAPED AND MASSACRED THOUSANDS OF HUNGARIANS SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY DESIRED TO LIVE IN FREEDOH, NOW 2J YEARS LATER HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF. IN AFGHANISTAN THE SOVIETS SHOWED THEIR TRUE COLOR AGAIN, I AM SURE YOU ARE AWARE OF THE KERALA MASSACRE WHERE OVER 2,000 AFGHANISTanianS were MURDERED AND THEIR BODIES BULLDOZED, SOME OF THEM STILL ALIVE, INTO A HASS GRAVE. RECENTLY YOU STATED THAT CONDITIONS IN AFGHANISTAN WERE MORE SERIOUS THAN THE SITUATION HAD BEEN IN HUNGARY AND CZECHOSLOVAKIA. THIS REMARK ONCE AGAIN SHOWS A LACK OF VISION IN AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT. ONE SOVIET MASSACRE IS NOT WORST THAN ANOTHER. ALL SUCH DESPICABLE SOVIET DEEDS WERE AND ALWAYS WILL BE ABHORRENT TO ALL DECENT AND PEACE LOVING PEOPLE. THE HUNGÁRIA PRIEOOHFIGHTER MOVEMENT, THE DEFACTQ POLITICAL AND CULTURAL REPRESENTATIVE OF HUNGARIANS ON ALL CONTINENTS OF THE WORLD# ASMS YOU HOW LONG AMERICA WILL CONTINUE TO COOPERATE, NEGOTIATE WITH AND PEED THE GOOLESS SOVIET REGIME? PROFESSOR ANDOR JOBB DE PAPOS PO BOX 35245, PURITAS STATION CLEVELAND OH 44135 23129 EST MGMCOMP MGM ■(Continued on Page 4)

Next

/
  • Layout
  • Zoom
  • Rotation
Thumbnails
Contents