Szittyakürt, 1979 (18. évfolyam, 2-12. szám)
1979-07-01 / 7-8. szám
Page 2 ¥10HT€* AUGUST 1979 of many books and articles on the Soviet Union and related subjects, Dr. Levi E. Dobriansky, a New York born Ukranian, defined a captive nation the following ways: “Any nation which has fallen under Communist domination primarily as the result of Soviet Russian imperialism is a Captive Nation.” (Robert Shaw, Spootlight, July 16, p. 13.), and he also points out that to call the U.S.S.R. a nation is “utter nonsense” nor is there a “Soviet People. ” There is only Soviet Imperialism! The Western news media and the general educational systems interchangeably use “Russian” for “Soviet Union” or “Soviet People” when in truth the Soviet Empire is made up in the majority by non-Russiansl There is even a confusion or at least disagreement as to which nation should or should not be called a Captive Nation because how a Marxist state comes into being is disagreed upon on the left and on the right both. The greater the confusion the easier it is for the Russians to expand their colonization efforts always under the guise of “national liberation to end colonialism!” (by the West). In the U.S.A. Captive Nations Week is usually held in July following Independence Day. However, Captive Nations Weeks are also observed (by the instigation of the U.S.) in South Korea, the Republic of China, and the Philippines and mass demonstrations are carried out on the streets which profess to support the Western influences and occupation in contrast to the Communist presence on the other. In America this year a number of major cities observed Captive Nations Week. In New York on July 15; in Chicago on July 21 and also in Phoenix, San Diego, Buffalo, Boston, Pittsburgh, Washington, D.C., Cleveland, Syracuse, Philadelphia, and New Orleans (ibid., p. 13). This year it is especially a popular issue to single out the Peoples’ Republic of China who just recently gained a free hand in dealing with Taiwan (the Republic of China). Dr. Ku-Cheng-kang, the honorary chairman of the World Anti-Communist League, and president of the Associations of Civic Organizations in Taiwan, will tour the U.S.A. He is the publisher of Asian Outlook, an anti-Communist monthly journal distributed world wide. Many American politicans also use the Captive Nations issue to gain popularity among various nationality groups in America. We can hear and sea many of these politicians at election time be it for local, state of for national offices. U.S. President James Carter had proclaimed the 20th of July as Captive Nations Week this year but refused to hold a formal White House ceremony in the Rose Garden. Dr. Bobrianskt stated that “...the Carter administration is not taking advantage of developments and circumstances which might liberate the Captive Nations, ” and “...human rights can be the center piece of American foreign policy if we know what human rights are...” (ibid. p. 16). But President Carter narrows down his bid for Human Rights to individuals and the rights of whole nations go unmentioned. The Americans, the British and the Soviet Russians have closely cooperated since the beginning of the Soviet Revolution of 1917. Much extra aid went to overthrow the Russian Czarist Empire during W.W. I and to save from collapse the newly born Soviet regime at the end of W.W. I. Lenin’s and Stalin’s Soviet policies of Russian imperialism went unopposed. The Soviet economy received aid and comfort from eager Western capitalist interests and when one or two of the captured nations attempted to slip out of Russian control the West was too slow to react at all. Mass executions and deportations imposed by the Russians against the dissidents were not reported in the Western media. For example, on June 21, 1941 the whole Lithuanian population rose up against the Soviet Russian occupying forces as the Russians were gathering up “all unreliables” and the best of the Lithuanian youth that would be useful for slave labor East of the Urals. The Russian NKVD (Russian Secret Police) had been over-powered and the deportation could not succeed. Hitler’s paratroopers swiftly aided the Lithuanian liberation efforts and Stalin was forced to let go of Lithuania until Churchill and F. D. Roosevelt extended unlimited aid to save the Soviet Union. The outcome was inevitable. The terrible Stalin and his Soviet Russian colonizing efforts were considered lesser evils than the small peoples self-liberating efforts! With U.S. and British aid the Lithuanians were thrown back to the Russian bear’s claws and some one-half million people were “legally” shipped to North-East Russia to perish in the slave labor camps. The death rate achieved nearly 50% and the Western news media keeps quiet even now or political facts are falsified or incomplete to confuse the populance. Confusion generally tends to lead to political apathy all together making the work of the Russian colonizers and their compatriots world wide that much easier. As we list the Captive Nations based on the Washington, D.C. Spotlight (7/16/79), a pro-American weekly newspaper that gives you “the other side of the news, ” the reader can see for himself how much more could be added to the list. (List of N.C. and maps on page 6.) The Soviet Union is superficially and forcefully composed of dozens of one time independent and separate nationalities, religious, and cultures, most of which are members of the Great Turanian Brotherhood! Also Hungary is considered to be a “Captive Nation” since 1949 even though Russia “liberated” her in 1945 and has never let go since. It is clear without a doubt that today the West is no more interested in the liberation of many of the Captive Nations as are the Colonizer Russians reluctant to let go of their enormous land holdings in Europe and in Asia. Britain and the U.S.A. play into the hands of the Soviets year after year. It often seems as though the Soviet Communist penetration has “reached the point where U.S. foreign policy is now made in Moscow?” (“U.S., a Captive Nation?” Editorial The Spotlight, 7/ /:/79, p. 15). Thus, we see Russian gains in Europe during W.W. I; the rape and destruction of Hungary, Poland and Bulgaria; the colonization of North Korea, North Vietnam, cuba, Cambodia, Laos, South Vietnam . . . and now the Russians are very active in Iran and it is only a matter of time that this oil rich territory will become a Russian sphere of interest. The U.S. has spent billions of tax dollar; to hold the Shah of Iran in power, buf in the moment the Russians showed an interest in the Iranian oil to supply the ever growing Soviet war machinery’s fuel needs, the Shah was dropped so fast that even he can’t figure out just what happened! The Soviets clearly stated their international interest for many decades now and the West unmistakeably plays into the Russian hands. Does the U.S. clearly support alien interests? Why did General Eisenhower direct his war efforts in Western Europe during W.W. II so that the Russians could grab half of Europe? Why was the “Iron Curtain” allowed to fall undisturbed until the Russians finished the “clean-up” and “reducation” of the newly acquired Captive Nations? Hungary and her heroic people time and time again has demonstrated her love of freedom. As the Polish workers in Posnan, Poland rose to demand better living conditions and were brutally shot in the Fall of 1956, by October 23, their Hungarian brothers rose in sympathy against the same Russian colonial yoke and the West sat dumbfounded. Other than slogans and promises not much more went with the Western winds to aid the courageously fighting Hungarians! But then why would the times be different then or even today from those of the centuries long cheating, connivings, and intriguings? Why should colonialist purposes and pretentions be different today from those of yesterdays? Even the languages that the colonizers speak are revealingly eclectic and international, best fitted for colonial jargon and international wheelingdealing. One has just to look at the Russian language and they will discover in it a tremendous number of Germanic, French, English, and now, American words. Dr. Josephy T. Shipley has the same opinion about American speech as he talks about the history, origins, background, and the psychological usage of words in his book entitled Dictionary of Word Origins (Littlefield, Adams and Co., Totowa New Jersey, 1977). “The American speech, like the American people, comes from all over the world. Not two percent of our English words first rose in the British Isles . . . twenty-five percent of our words migrated along the rivers; fifty percent by the sea. The rest were gleaned from here and there, and the farthest corners, brought home by the three restless minglers, the soldier, the trader, and the priest” (Preface, p. VII). The more native the language the people speak, the less imperialistic they are. Curiously these people seem to make up much of the list of the Captive Nations. The truer their inherent cultures are the more they tend to suffer from the brutally disruptive international trends of fashion in art, in music, and in philosophy. Some things do not change in history and some things do. There are colonizers and there are Captive Nations. To bring a change about this long historical reality, the independence and freedom loving individual nations will have to want the same thing at the same time and arm-in-arm, shoulder-to-shoulder will have to rise again and again until the hypocritical mark of the colonizers will surely fall. The rulers of the Captive Nations dread religious revivals, the upsurge of national cultures and the renewal of the true national languages. The Russians nearly fell apart as a result of the glorious October 23, 1956 Hungarian Freedomfight. Although the colonial status of the Soviet Union did not change a crack still appeared on her walls of falsehood: THE CAPTIVE NATIONS WEEK RESOLUTION WAS BORN SOON AFTER THE HUNGARIAN FREEDOMFIGHT OF 1956! A change in history took place! “What goes up must come down *» In the Johnson Space Center in Huston, Texas, U.S.A. on July 11, one space project came to an end: the Sky Lab that was sent up on its mission on January 27, 1973 finally came down in the town of Kelgoori, Western Australia. About four years ago it became clear that the orbit of the Sky Lab was failing and the scientists of the Johnson Space Center thought that they would be able to bring it down safely and conserve it for further use but that plan soon fissled out as they looked at the enormous costs. Man still does not know how to deal with the physical laws that God put into effect. The human mortals only begin to attempt to formulate what is being detected by their five senses. It was just a little over 10 years ago on July 20, 1969 when the American Astronaut Neil Armstrong made a little step on the surface of the moon which was hailed as being “One giant leap for mankind.” Man’s dream since the dawn of time came to be realized at last. The imagination of the space engineers in the U.S.A., the hard working hands of the American workers put America high on the pedestal of fame and respect world wide. The Americans were first and high up there! The American economy and the dollar were too and the gas was cheap! But as with all things: “What goes up must come down ...” Many American tourists, G.I.’s and businessmen know who had By Sir Isaac Newton traveled abroad that the value of the American wonder dollar sank to an all time low as well as respect for American willingness to stand up and fight, by the end of the 1970’s. But there is hope for the world! The high flying bloody star of the Soviet imperialists will “By the universal law of physics and metaphysics” also come down once and their reign over the ancient land of the Magyars will come to an end! SO WILLS THE GOD OF THE MAGYARS!___________________ ffli HitUKrAMA jFkwcM fiwm
