Szemészet, 2015 (152. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)

2015-03-01 / 1. szám

A keratoconus diagnosztikája és kezelése

other sequence variants segregating with phenotype at keratoconus 13q32 susceptibility locus. Eur J Hum Genet 2012; 20: 389-397.

5. Guan T, Liu C, Ma Z, Ding S. The point mutation and polymorphism in candidate gene TGFBI in Chinese population. Gene 2012; 503: 137-139.

6. Hughes AE, Bradley DT, Campbell M, et a I. Mutation altering the miR- 184 seed region causes familial keratoconus with cataract. Am J Hum Genet 2011; 89: 628-633.

7. Lechner J, Dash DR Muszynska D, et al. Mutational spectrum of the ZEB1 gene in corneal dystrophies supports a genotype-phenotype correlation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 2013; 54: 3215-3223.

8. Li X, Bykhovskaya Y, Haritunians T, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies a potential novel gene locus for keratoconus, one of the commonest causes for corneal transplantation in developed countries. Hum Mol Genet 2012; 21: 421-429.

9. Li X, Bykhovskaya Y Canedo AL, et al. Genetic association of C0L5A1 variants in keratoconus patients suggest a complex connection between corneal thinning and keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 2013; 54: 2696-2704.

10. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998; 42: 297-319.

11. Rabinovitz YS, Garbus J, McDonnell PJ. Computer-assisted corneal topography in family members of patients with keratoconus. Arch Ophthalmol 1990; 108: 365-371.

12. Tuft SJ, Hassan H, Georg S, et al. Keratoconus in 18 pairs of twins. Acta Ophthalmol 2012; 90: 482-486.

A keratoconus klinikai diagnosztikája

1. Bak-Nielsen S, Pedersen IB, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Dynamic Scheimpflug-based assessment of keratoconus and the effects of corneal cross-linking. J Refract Surg 2014; 30: 408-414.

2. Barr JT, Wilson BS, Gordon MO, et al. CLEK Study Group. Estimation of the incidence and factors predictive of corneal scarring in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. Cornea 2006; 25: 16-25.

3. Belin MW, Cambier JL, Nabors JR, Ratliff CD. PAR Corneal Topography System (PAR CTS): the clinical application of close-range photogrammetry. Optom Vis Sei 1995; 72: 828-837.

4. Belin MW, Khachikian SS. An introduction to understanding elevationbased topography: how elevation data are displayed - a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2009; 37: 14-29.

5. Belin MW, Villavicencio OE Ambrosio RR Jr Tomographic parameters for the detection of keratoconus: suggestions for screening and treatment parameters. Eye Contact Lens 2014; 40: 326-330.

6. Cairns G, McGhee CN. Orbscan computerized topography: attributes, applications, and limitations. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 205-220.

7. Farn HB, Lim KL. Corneal elevation indices in normal and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 1281-1287.

8. Fontes BM, Ambrosio R Jr, Jardim D, et al. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 673-679.

9. Fujimoto JG, Brezinski ME, Tearney GJ, et al. Optical biopsy and imaging using optical coherence tomography. Nat Med 1995; 1: 970-972.

10. Kovács I, Miháltz К, Ecsedy M, Németh J, Nagy ZZ. The role of reference body selection in calculating posterior corneal elevation and prediction of keratoconus using rotating Scheimpflug camera. Acta Ophthalmol 2011; 89: 251-256.

11. Kránitz К, Kovács I, Miháltz К, et al. Changes of corneal topography indices after CXL in progressive keratoconus assessed by Scheimpflug camera. J Refract Surg 2014; 30: 374-378.

12. Li Y, Meisler DM, Tang M, et al. Keratoconus diagnosis with optical

coherence tomography pachymetry mapping. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 2159-2166.

13. Lim L, Wei RH, Chan WK, Tan DT. Evaluation of keratoconus in Asians: role of Orbscan II and Torney TMS-2 corneal topography. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143: 390-400.

14. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 156-162.

15. Maeda N, Klyce SD. Smolek MK, Thompson HW. Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 1994; 35: 2749-2757.

16. Módis L Jr, Langenbucher A, Seitz B. Scanning-slit and specular microscopic pachymetry in comparison with ultrasonic determination of corneal thickness. Cornea 2001; 20: 711-714.

17. Niederer RL, Perumal D, Sherwin T, McGhee CN. Laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy reveals reduced innervation and reduction in cell density in all laOyers of the keratoconic cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 2008; 49: 2964-2970.

18. Patel DV, McGhee CN. Mapping the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus in keratoconus by in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 2006; 47: 1348-1351.

19. Rabinowitz YS. Videokeratographic indices to aid in screening for keratoconus. J Refract Surg 1995; 11: 371-379.

20. Rabinowitz YS, Rasheed K. KISA% index: a quantitative videokeratography algorithm embodying minimal topographic criteria for diagnosing keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25: 1327-1335.

21. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I, Mantry S. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006; 29: 257-262.

22. Smolek MK, Klyce SD. Current keratoconus detection methods compared with a neural network approach. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 1997; 38: 2290-2299.

23. Szalai E, Berta A, Hassan Z, Módis L Jr. Reliability and repeatability of swept-source Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 485-494.

24. Wolffsohn JS, Safeen S, Shah S, Laiquzzaman M. Changes of corneal biomechanics with keratoconus. Cornea 2012; 31: 849-854.

25. Yasuno Y, Madjarova VD, Makita S, et al. Three-dimensional and highspeed swept-source optical coherence tomography for in vivo investigation of human anterior eye segments. Opt Express 2005; 13:10652-10664.

26. Yeniad B, Yilmaz S, Bilgin LK. Evaluation of the microstructure of cornea by in vivo confocal microscopy in contact lens wearing and non-contact lens wearing keratoconus patients. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010; 33: 167-170.

27. Zadnik K, Mannis MJ, Johnson CA, Rich D. Rapid contrast sensitivity assessment in keratoconus. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64: 693-697.

A keratoconus kezelése kontaktlencsével

1. Barnett M, Mannis MJ. Contact lenses in the management of keratoconus. Cornea 2011; 30: 1510-1516.

2. Barr JT. Contact lenses for keratoconus narrowing the information gap. Contact Lens Spectrum 1998; 13: 10.

3. Barr JT, Wilson BS, Gordon MO, et al. Estimation of the incidence and factors predictive of corneal scarring in the CLEK study. Cornea 2006; 25: 16-25.

4. Edrington ТВ, Szczotka LB, Barr JT, et al. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) study group. Rigid contact lens