Marta, Livius et al.: The Late Bronze Age Settlement of Nyíregyháza-Oros „Úr Csere” (Satu Mare, 2010)
IV. Liviu Marta - Nagy L. Márta - Daniel V. Sana: Ceramics
items with the rim obliquely curved towards the inside, model that would become intensively used in the period of the pre-Gáva and Gáva174 cultural manifestations. One bowl was discovered with a turban-shaped rim (Pi. 5/5), a rarely encountered element within the pottery assigned to the Hajddbagos-Cehăluţ175 cultural group but which came to be intensively used in the Gáva culture176. Variant 3C: Conical bowl with incurved rim (Pi. 33/3). An analogy for the bowl of Oros was found in the settlement of Petea-Csengersima, the latter having, however, an out-curved rim177. Bowls of this variant were discovered at Battonya, in a settlement of the Gáva culture178. Type 4: Conical bowl with accentuated shoulder and out-curved rim. Variant 4Aa\ Conical bowls with an out-curved rim (PI. 6/1,26/6,29/9, 37/5), the shoulder decorated with protuberances surrounded by channels (PI. 12/ 3, 39/3) or with straight, incised lines (PI. 12/2). This shape is frequent during the Late Bronze Age, the models discovered in the settlement being used until the Reinecke BzD period. They are encountered in the pottery assigned to the Wietenberg179 culture, the Tumuli period180, the Hajdúbagos-Cehăluţ cultural group181 and the Balta Sărată group182. Bowls with intensely bent shoulder were identified in the graves of Gelej necropolis, dated during the transition period of Reinecke BzD-HAl phase183 and they continued to be used during the Gáva culture184. Variant 4Ab: Conical bowl, with accentuated shoulder and lobed rim. One item is decorated with short, curved lines (PI. 18/6) and another one is ornamented with protuberances on the shoulder line (PI. 36/1). It is a shape considered characteristic for the Tumuli culture185 but which is very often encountered within the Hajdúbagos-Cehăluţ group, too186. Its presence within the deposit of vessels from Debrecen187 is to be noticed. 174 Kemenczei 1984, Pl. CXXXI/26; V. Szabó 2002, Pl. 11/3, 15/7; V. Szabó 1996, PI. 41/7. 175 Nagy 2007, Pl. V/9. 176 Kemenczei 1984, Pl. CXXX/19; V. Szabó 1996, PI. 41/9; V. Szabó 2002, PI. 17/2. 177 Marta 2009, PI. 56/6. 178 V. Szabó 2002, Pl. 2/5. 179 Ciugudean 1997, Pl. 2/6,16/1. 180 Kovács 1975, Pl. 54/2; Trogmayer 1975, Pl. II/4; Ilon 1996, Pl. 6/8. 181 Kovács 1970, Pl. 1/14; Németi 1978, Pl. 4/1; Kacsó 1997, Pl. II/5, 8; Bejinariu-Lakó 1996, Pl. VII/8; Bejinariu-Lakó 2000, Pl. 29/6; Nagy 2007, Pl. XI/6. 182 Gumă 1997, Pl. LXVIII/13, LXIX/1. 183 Kemenczei 1989, Pl. 10/4. 184 V. Szabó 1996, Pl. 13/10-12. 185 Kemenczei 1968, Pl. 4/16; Trogmayer 1975, Pl. 9:102/2, 32:356/4. 186 Kovács 1970, Pl. 8/2; Németi 1978, Pl. 1/1; Kacsó 1997, Pl. VII/9; Bejinariu-Lakó 2000, Pl. 6/5; Bejinariu-Lakó-Sana 2004, Pl. III/3; Nagy 2007, Pl. II/4. 187 Poroszlai 1984, p. 92, Pl. 11/3, X/l-3. 38
