Marta, Livius et al.: The Late Bronze Age Settlement of Nyíregyháza-Oros „Úr Csere” (Satu Mare, 2010)
IV. Liviu Marta - Nagy L. Márta - Daniel V. Sana: Ceramics
39/6). This shape is well represented in the pottery of the Hajdiibagos-Cehăluţ cultural group133, being found in the Suciu de Sus culture, too134. This shape is frequent within the Otomani culture135, continuing in the Tumuli culture136. An unusual fragment of this variant, resembling only in shape with the other cups, is one with rich incisedexcised meanders decoration (PI. 21/4). Judging from the decoration style, it is obvious that it belongs to the Suciu de Sus culture. Analogies are present in the deposit of vessels of Nyirmada, dated to the RBD period, where a vessel similar in shape and decoration with the one of Oros was discovered137. Type 1C: Wide-mouthed cup with an out-curved rim, high arched neck and globular-flattened body (PI. 17/7-8, 19/2, 24/6-7, 25/2). Some have small handles attached on the shoulder, the middle line being decorated with vertical (PI 11/2, 12/4, 20/5, 22/4-5, 24/7, 32/2,5) and oblique (PI. 24/2, 32/3) channels. In one case the body of the cup is decorated with almost horizontal channels (PI. 37/1). Variant 1C is present in the case of the Hajdiibagos-Cehăluţ group138 but it can also be encountered in the pottery repertory of the Otomani139, Wietenberg140 and Suciu de Sus141 cultures. Type 2: Bi-conical cups. They have out-curved rim, short arched neck and bi-conical body (PI. 6/4, 24/1,4,8, 33/7, 35/5). It is a shape often encountered in the archeological material of the Hajdiibagos-Cehăluţ group142 and in the the Berkesz-type discoveries143. One item with a rich incised-excised decoration was discovered in the complex number 10 (PL 3/2). This is evidently related to the Suciu de Sus culture144 which contains undecorated items, too145. The cups assigned to the Suciu de Sus culture generally have a more rounded shoulder, while the items with a more accentuated shoulder within the 133 Kacsó 1997, Pl. VII/11; Bejinariu-Lakó-Sana 2004, Pl. 1/6; Nagy 2005, PL V/1,4. 134 Marta 2009, PL 25/2,12; L. Nagy-Scholtz 2009, PL 1/5, III/1-2. 135 Bader, 1978, Pl. XVIII/2, PL XVIII/4. 136 Tocik 1964, PL XII/13; Kovács 1966, PL 6/9; Trogmayer 1975, PL 41/1,5. 137 Tóth-Marta 2005, PL 5/1; Marta 2009, PL 27/4, 30/4. 138 Bejinariu-Lakó 2000, PL 10/5,17B/2-3; Bejinariu-Lakó-Sana 2004, PL VI/4. 139 Bader 1978, PL XVIII/15, 18. 140 Chidioşan 1980, PL 18/4, 7. 141 Marta 2005, PL 2/1, 4/12, 14; Marta 2009, PL 48/9; L. Nagy-Scholtz 2009, IX. t./7. 142 Kovács 1967, PL 11/2; Nagy 2005, PL V/6; Nagy 2007, PL 1/13; Németi 2009, PL II/5 (with reference to the Berkesz culture, see Nagy 2007, p. 138). 143 With reference to the Berkesz culture, see Nagy 2007, p. 138. 144 Demeterová 1984, PL IV/7; Tóth-Marta 2005, PL 8/1; Marta 2005, PL 3/4; Marta 2009, PL 23/10, 24/6, 51/2, 53/2.; L. Nagy-Scholtz 2009, PL IV/1. 145 Demeterová 1984, PL IV/7; Tóth-Marta 2005, PL 8/1; Marta 2005, PL 3/4; Marta 2009, PL 23/10, 24/6, 51/2, 53/2; L. Nagy-Scholtz 2009, PL IV/1. 35
