Ciubotă, Viorel - Nicolescu, Gheorge - Ţucă, Cornel (szerk.): Jurnal de operaţiuni al Comandamentului Trupelor din Transilvania (1918-1921) 2. (Satu Mare, 1998)
Lingvistică şi etnografie / Sprachwissenschaft und Volkskunde / Nyelvészet és néprajz - Contacte culturale în prezentarea muzeografică / Kulturkontakte in der musealen Präsentation / Kultúrák találkozásának múzeumi ábrázolása
558 Io an Horga sphere of community compulsions. The neighbourhood was the place for the marriage but this did not mean alienation since out of 7 marriages 6 were based on the relation O/GC. The ethnic determination was strong, the confessional differences were ignored and even if in an intimate relationship they were not visible there were cases when they could act as a compulsion. The degree of alienation from relatives and confession by marriage of the young GC from this district was reduced to only 1 marriage. This demonstrates the existence of well-delimited ethnic and confessional communities in the valley of Barcau but which were open to dialogue. The district of the archpriest of BEIUS (Belenyensis) The district of the archpriest of Beius had 14 parishes situated in the Depression of Beius. Only in 2 of them were performed mixed marriages, representing 14.28%. This means a clear delimitation of marital strategies on intra-confessional co-ordinates. This reality is due to the confessional structure of the population in the 14 parishes. There are only 2 parishes with mixed population of GC and O (Dragoteni and Pocola). The other parishes had a compact GC population (Fizis, Delani, Petrani, Prisaca and Valani), or which lived together with Hungarian inhabitants of RC or HC confession (Uileac, Finis, Ioanis, Negru, Suncuius)5 * * * 9. Here the marital behaviour is strongly influenced by the confession, with few exceptions in the case of Uileacu de Beius10. In this locality the degree of alienation is high due both to marriage outside the local community or the confessional community. Beius represents a particularity by its ethnic and confessional structure that offers a confessional and ethnic equilibrium (864 GC, 969 O, 5 years before its publication. There is also a kind of party evaluation in the “Schematismus”. The greatest error in it is registered at Doma. The “Schematismus” (page 186) had registered only 278 inhabitants in comparison to the 851 inhabitants registered in “Recensământul din 1900” (page 130) because it did not take into consideration the colonisation of the German, Hungarian and Slovak populations in the locality as a result of the industrial activities in the fields of glass and asphaltation. At Giulesti, a GC girl married a boy from Demisoara (an O village) (DOSS 491/1930, f. 14). At Tria, one of the two O/GC marriages is outside the community with a boy from Dernisoara, a neighbouring locallity and the only HC/GC marriages is also outside the community with a HC boy from Misca, a neighbouring locality (DOSS 491/1930, f.9). 9 IOAN HORGA, Strategii maritale în Nord-Vestul României în a doua jumătate a secolului al XIX-lea şi începutul secolului al XX-lea. Căsătoriile mixte din dieceza greco-catolică de Oradea, Oradea, 1999. 10 At Uileacu de Beius, the GC/O marriage was outside the community (with a woman from Urvis, an O village) and HC/GC one was in the same locality where the HC Hungarians were in majority (DOSS 492/1904, f.96-97).
