Szőcs, Péter Levente (szerk.): Satu Mare. Studii şi comunicări. Seria arheologie 22/1. (2005)

Cristian Virag: Problematici ale neoliticului din nord-vestul României şi zonele invecinate

Problematici ak neoliticului din nord-vestu/ României şi portele învecinate

Potushniak 1997: M. Potushniak, Some results of research on the Middle NeoBlbic layer from a multilevel settlement near the village of /astavne/ '/.apseşnny — Kovadomb in the Carpathian Umane. 1 n: Ny) AMÉ ’95 — ’96, Nyíregyháza, 1997, p. 35 -5!.

Potushniak 1999: M. Potushniak, A multilevel settlement on Mo/a l lora at Mukachem/Munkács — Kishegy, ln: NyJAMK, Nyíregyháza, 1999, p. 9—37.

Raczky 1979—1980: P. Raczky, New Figurai Representations of the Körös Culture from the Middle 7 Isa Region and their I lis/orical Connections. In: Szolnok MMF.vk, p. 27—33.

Raczky 1982: P. Raczky, 1 'orherichl über die sich der Dritten iheiss Stufe Ansenden Archaeologischen Arbeiten im Komitat S%)/nok. ln: AR, 109, 22.3-229.

Raczky 1983: P. Raczky, A korai neolithikumbo! a középső neo/ithikumba való átmenet kérdései a közép- és felső- Tiszuvidck.cn. In: Ali, 110,2, 161-194.

Raczky 1986: P. Raczky, Megjegyzések az „alföldi vona/diszys kerámia ” kialakulásának, kérdéséhez (Notes of the problem of the appearance of the Alföld Unear Pottery). In: J. Farkas - P. Német (lids.): Régészeti Tanulmányok Kclet- Magyarországról, Debrecen, 1986, 25-4.3.

Raczky 1988: P. Raczky, A Tisza -vidék kulturális és kronológiai kapcsolatai a balkánnal és az, Tigeikummal a rreolikum, rézkor időszakában. Újabb kutatási eredmények, és problémák, Szolnok, 1988.

Raczky et colab. 1997: Raczky P. — Anders Alexandra - Nagy' limese — Kurucz Katalin - Z. Hajdú - Walter Maier-Arendt, Polgár—Csöszfialom-díilő. In: Utak a múltba. Az M.3-as autópálya régészeti leletmentései, Budapesta, 1997, p. .34—47.

Roska 1910: M. Roska, A tasnádi neolitkori leletek. In: Ali., 1910, p. 354—361.

Roska 19.32: M. Roska, Sta/iurieapreistorică de la Valea ltdMihai. In: AISC, 1928—19.32, p. 7.3—80.

Roska 19.38: M. Roska, Bibar-vármcgyc múltja a legrégibb időktől a honfoglalásig. In: MVVM, XXV, 19.38, p. 1-15.

Roska 1939: M. Roska, Szatmár-vármegye múltja a legrégibb időktől a holtfoglalásig. 1 n: MW M, XXV 1, 19.39, p. .34—5.3.

Roska 1942: M. Roska, lirde/y régészeti repertóriuma I, Őskor / ibesaiims ariliquitalnm Vransilvanicariim, I. Praehis/orica. Cluj, 1942.

Siska 1974: S. Siska, Abdeckung von Siedlungen und einem Gräberfeld ans den jüngeren Steinzeit in Kopcany, Kreis Micha/ovcc. ln: AR. 26/1,1974, p. 3-15.

Siska 1979: S. Siska, Die Bukker Kultur in der Ostskwakrschcn Tiefebene. I n: Slov Arch, 27, 1979, p. 245-290.

Siska 1989: S. Siska, Kultúra .r vyehodnon Urnámon keramikou na Slovensku, Bratislava, 1989.

Vizdal 1973: M. Vizdal, V.emlin v m/adsejdobe kamennej, Kosice, 197.3.

Vizdal 1989: M. Vizdal, Rukombnrsk.y vyrohno-remes/ny objckl v Humennom. ln: AR, 41/6, 1989, p. 654-662.

Virág 2004: C. Virág, Un complex neolitic de la I lalmeu-Vamă. In: Studii de Istorie Veche şi Arheologic, Omagiu profesorului Sabin Adrian Luca, Hunedoara, 2004, p. 25—45.

Virág 2004a: C. Virág, Aşezările grupului neolitic Pişco/t din ruird-ves/ul României. In: Satu Mare StCom, Seria Arheologie, XV1I-XX1/I; 2000-2004, p. 13-27.

Virág 2004b: C. Virág, Cercetări arheologice la Urzicaţi—Vamă. In: AMP, XXVI, 2004, p. 41—76.

Trogmayer 1972: O. Trogmayer, Körös Gruppe—Unienbandkcramik. In: Alba Regia 12, 1972, p. 71-76.

Questions of Neolithic period ofNW Romania and neighbouring area (Abstract)

The questions of F,arly Neolithic of NW Romania were solved according to the results of the archaeological excavations undertaken in ‘70—‘80 at Homorodu de Sus, Homorodtt ele Mijloc (Bader 1968), Dumbrava (Dumitraşcu, Ijuca 1991), Fughiu (Ignat 1978), Sttplacu de Barcău (Ignat 1978), Zăttan (Tazgrovici, Ixrk.o 1981). During the past two decades similar discoveries have been made at Tăşnacl—Sere (where Neta Iercoşan excavated for more than ten years) and at Că/ineşti— Dâmbul Sfintei Mării. The last one represents the northernmost site of Starcevo—Grip culture in Romania. Starcevo—Criş discoveries have also been made beyond the borderline of the area of Körös group, which has been imposed Iry hungarian scientists establishing the north limit in Beretău I 'alley (Ka/icz Makkay 1977, p. 18—19; Comşa 1960, p. 217-218; Ka/icz, 1971, p. 146—147). Such discovery also exist at Nagykörűből, Nagyecsed, Tiszgibezfled, Fenyeslitke, Tisgacsege, Rétkőzperencs, Méhtelek, in Ungaria, and Buciumi, Chendu, Ciunteşti, Dej, Drágít, Fughiu, Hámorod, Moigrad, Sarán, Zău an, Tăşnacl etc, in Romania (Lazproviri, Németi 1983, p. 25). The Middle Neolithic Pişco/t group is a cultural group which unfolds itself in North-West of Romania and which belongs to the large area of a painted pottery culture. This area is certificacled in Transilvania but also in eastern Hungary, Slovakia and Ukraine (Potushniak 1997, p. 37—39). A major problem of Romanian archaeology is that each research of an archaeological site bears a new cultural facies, cultural aspect, group or culture. For example then were many names given to one of the Jxite Neolithic phenomena: Ceşmeu, Suplacu de Barcău, Tisa II, Tisa—Herpály—Csőszhalom, Tisa II—Hetpá/y, Dumbrava-Sup/ac—Sa/ca Il—Seleuş, Dumbrava, Sa/ca-Herpá/y.

25