B. Papp szerk.: Studia Botanica Hungarica 36. 2005 (Budapest, 2005)

Dobolyi, Konstantin: Phytosociological evaluation and multivariate analysis of the habitat of Linum dolomiticum Borbás (Linaceae) II.

Table 14. Distribution of the water preference categories (BORHIDI 1993) (expressed in percentage). Water preference Groups of relevés categories I II III IV V VI 1 48.3 47.0 16.2 21.2 20.6 16.6 2 23.8 23.5 19.8 24.3 20.6 17.3 3 24.0 26.2 53.6 45.5 47.4 57.1 4 3.6 3.3 84 7.9 0.9 7.4 5 0.3 ­1.3 0.7 4.5 1.6 6 ­­­­­­7 ­­1.0 0.4 ­­8-12 ­­­­­Group V Relevés: 89-90, 92-95, 126-128 (Table 4). Characteristics of the group: - typical exposure: N, NW, W (Table 8), - the total cover of vegetation varies between 75 and 100%, - dominant species: Anthericum ramosum, Anthyllis vulneraria, Carex hu­milis, Chrysanthemum lanceolatum, Festuca pollens, Fraxinus ornus, Ge­nista pilosa, Helianthemum canum, Jurinea mollis, Phyteuma orbiculare, Quercus pubescens, - Mega-mesophanerophyta, Chamaephyta and Geophyta species are of char­acteristic groups here (Table 9), - the highest proportion of Subatlantic species (7.2%) (Table 10), - phytosociological composition: the highest proportion of the Quercetalia pubescentis-petraeae and Orno-Ostryon species (Table 11), - low nitrogen preference (Table 16). Vegetation type: this group is considered a variant of the Pannonian karst white oak low woods. The herb layer is close to Festuco-pallenti-Brometum pannonici Zólyomi 1958 (Fig. 2), but Bromus pannonicus is almost absent. Group VI Relevés: 51, 53, 69, 113-116, 118-119, 131 (Table 5). Characteristics of the group: - typical exposure: N, (NW), (Table 8),

Next

/
Thumbnails
Contents