B. Papp szerk.: Studia Botanica Hungarica 35. 2004 (Budapest, 2004)

Erzberger, Peter; Papp, Beáta: Annotated checklist of Hungarian bryophytes

Barbula enderesii Garov. - doubtful according to BOROS (1968), missing in ORBÁN and VAJDA (1983). Bryum barnesii J. B. Wood. - reported by DULL (1985), but since B. barnesii was considered by Dull as synonym of B. bicolor, this record is doubtful. No specimen seen. Bryum cyclophyllum (Schwägr.) Bruch et Schimp. - doubtful according to BOROS (1968), missing in ORBÁN and VAJDA (1983). Cratoneuron curvicaule (Jur.) G. Roth. - not reported for Hungary according to HEDENÄS (2003), but reported by DULL (1985); however, this report is unlikely because in Central Europe C. curvicaule is a montane-alpine taxon (HEDENÄS 2003, GRIMS 1999); no specimen seen. Cynodontium gracilescens (F. Weber et D. Möhr) Schimp. - the only specimen determined by Latzel is rejected in BOROS (1968) (Boros revised it to Dichodontiumpellucidum); however, Boros's determination is probably wrong (Erzberger, unpubl.). The identity of the specimen still awaits resolution. Dicranum bergeri Blandow ex Hoppe. - reported by DULL (1984), but unlikely, since it is a boreo-montane taxon, no specimen seen. Dicranum fuscescens Sm. - the only reports of the taxon as var. falcifolium Braithw. and var. congestion Brid. by Latzel are estimated doubtful in BOROS (1968); not reported in ORBÁN and VAJDA (1983); in DULL (1984) D. fuscescens is not reported, whereas D. congestum is, but in DULL (1992) this report is obviously thought unreliable, because it "has to be verified for Hu.". Encalypta alpina Sm. - doubtful according to BOROS (1968), not reported in ORBÁN and VAJDA (1983), nor in DULL (1984). Encalypta rhaptocarpa Schwägr. - doubtful according to BOROS (1968), not reported in ORBÁN and VAJDA (1983), nor in DULL (1984); according to a remark in BOROS (1968) the specimens from the Bükk Mts are intermediate between E. rhaptocarpa and E. vulgaris, perhaps aff. E. trachymitria Ripart (cf. NYHOLM 1998). The true identity of these specimens remains to be established. ^Entosthodon obtusus (Hedw.) Lindb. (Funaria obtusa (Hedw.) Lindb.). - The report in ORBÁN and VAJDA (1983) is based on a single record by Degen, which is questioned in BOROS (1968). A doubtful specimen from a different locality was revised to E. cf. fascicularis (B. Papp, unpubl.). Specimen: BP 114587. Comit. Győr. In loco inculto paludoso prope pag. Nagyszentpálpuszta, prope Győrszemere. 08.07.1941, leg. S. Polgár, det. A. Boros. No other specimen of E. obtusus from Hungary could be located in BP, EGR or SZO. Grimmia decipiens (Schultz) Lindb. - in BOROS (1968) one report by Szepesfalvi and one report by Latzel are estimated doubtful, reports from Mátra Mts are rejected; omitted in ORBÁN and VAJDA (1983) and DULL (1984); not reported for Hungary in MUNOZ and PANDO (2000); no specimen seen. Grimmia incurva Schwägr. - MUNOZ and PANDO (2000) quote a specimen (A. Boros s.n., BP) that could not be located. MAIER and GEISSLER (1995) report the altitudinal range of G. incurva between 1,900 and 3,080 m a.s.l. The occurrence in present-day Hungary thus seems highly unlikely. Until appropriate material is located, the occurrence of G. incurva in Hungary cannot be accepted. *Grimmia sessitana De Not. (Grimmia reflexidens Müll. Hal.; Grimmia alpestris (F. Weber et D. Mohr) Schleich, var. subsulcata (Limpr.) Broth.). - Nomenclature according to Maier (2002b); MUNOZ (1998b) quotes G. reflexidens Müll. Hal. as the correct name for G, sessitana De Not., but this is rejected by MAIER (2002b); in MUNOZ (1998b) as well as in MUNOZ and PANDO (2000) Hungary is missing from the world distribution, but the species is reported in ORBÁN and VAJDA (1983) (as G. sessitana f. subsulcata) and in BOROS (1968) (as Grimmia alpestris var. subsulcata). However, the specimens in BP belong to G. funalis, revision by J. Muiioz and E. Maier. Until appropriate material is located, G. sessitana must be considered to be absent from the Hungarian bryoflora.