L. Hably szerk.: Studia Botanica Hungarica 22. 1990 (Budapest, 1990)

Description: There were three apical leaflets of an oddly pinnated leaf remaining here, The form of the leaflets is elliptical, their apex and basis is rounded. The basis of the side leaves is slightly asymmetrical. The midvein is strong, the venation is craspedodromous

. The margin of the leaves are toothed, the secondary veins terminating in the teeth. The apices of the teeth are acute, their apical side is slightly convex, the basal side is convex. The sinuses between the teeth are acute. The length of the apical leaflet is 2 cm, its width is 1.3 cm. The two side-leaflets are hardly smaller. The leaflets correspond to the rounded type leaflets published by BUZEK (1971). The species itself is fairly variable, there are longer leaflets and pieces with acute basis equally assigned to this taxon. In Hungary, the species Rosa legányii Andreánszky was described from the Sarmatian flora. The morphology of this species, however, is completely different from the piece found in the Vértesszőlös assemblage. Rosa bohemica was amply found in the Bohemian Miocene floras. Its recent equivalent could be defined with great difficulties only, all the more because the recent species of roses are also very variable. The clarification of their taxonomy is further complicated by the existence of many natural hybrids

. In respect of climatic requirements, however, the genus is more unified. They do not need very high temperature, but they are not resistant to long cold periods. In the natural vegetation they prefer the sunny hillsides, sparse vegetation. Aceraceae Acer L. Acer angustilobum Heer sensu Hantke Pl. XXXII, Figs. 1-3; Pl. XXXIII, Fig. 1; Figs. 115, 117-120, 1859 Acer angustilobum Heer Figs. 4, 7, 13. 1860 Acer angustilobum Heer Pl. 53, Figs. 1-4. 1870 Acer angustilobum Heer 1885 Acer angustilobum Heer Fig. 16. 1891 Acer angustilobum Heer 1910 Acer angustilobum Heer 1930 Acer angustilobum Heer 1954 Acer angustilobum Heer 1955 Acer angustilobum Heer 1961 Acer cf. arígustilobum Pl. 19, Fig. 4. 1963 Acer angustilobum Heer 1964 Acer angustilobum Heer Fig. 4. 1965 Acer angustilobum Heer 1972 Acer angustilobum Heer Figs. 1-7; Pl. 6, Figs Pl. 35, Figs. 1-10; Pl ; Heer, p. 57, Pl. 117, Fig. 25a; Pl. 118, ; Ludwig, p. 131-132, Pl. 52, Figs. 3, 8; ; Engelhardt, p. ; Engelhardt, p. 27, Pl. 7, Fig. 26. 349, Pl. 13, Figs. 9, 11-13, Engelhardt, p. 180, Pl. 11, Figs. 2-3. Engelhardt, p. 21, Pl. 2, Figs. 15-16. Kräusel, p. 41, Fig. 12. Hantke, p. 77, Pl. 13, Figs. 2, 4-5. Nötzold, Pl. 3, Figs. 7-8. Heer; Knobloch, p. 285, Pl. 11, Fig. 4; ; Mai, Pl. 10, Fig. 17. ; Waither, Pl. 19, Figs. 1, 3, 5; Pl. 20, ; Hantke, p. 86-88, Pl. 15, Figs. 6-8, 10. ; Walther, p. 40, Pl. 3, Figs. 1-6; Pl. 4, . 1-5; Pl. 33, Figs. 1-7; Pl. 34, Figs. 1-6; . 36, Figs. 1-4. Material: No.: 76.51.1.; 76.101.1, 76.285.1.; 76.302.1. 7 pieces 76.127.1. ; 76.209.1. ; 76.270.1 Description: Generally, these leaves are small and, with one exception, fragmented. Their most characteristic feature is the narrow lobes and the characteristic venation. The angles between the midvein and the central vein of the lobe is as follows: 52 , 41 , 47 , 40 , 39 . Apparently, these values are ranging around 40 , thus the leaves are fairly narrow. An exception under this rule is the print 76.51.1., where the angle between the midvein and the 34