Petőcz Kálmán (szerk.): National Populism and Slovak - Hungarian Relations in Slovakia 2006-2009 (Somorja, 2009)

Annex

Annex - Marie Vrabcová tion from, who had authorized him to inspect the case file, and whether it was he who provided photographs of Malinová from the case file to the press. The list of witnesses to be questioned that was proposed by Kvasnica also included MP Peter Gabura and his three assistants, namely Peter Korček who had filed a motion to criminal prosecution of Malinová on grounds of false evidence, Igor Cibula and Zuzana Trnková, wife of the attorney general. The next on the list were the psychiatrists who treated Malinová after the attack - László Sárközy of Dunajská Streda and Jozef Hašto of Trenčín. Malinová’s legal counsel also viewed important to question Ladislav Gužík, the false evidence case investigator who was supposed to explain why the motion for criminal prosecution filed by Peter Korček was not included in the case file, whether Korček had been questioned at all and if so, why the transcript from this interrogation was also missing from the case file. Last but not least, Kvasnica proposed to question two cabinet members, namely Prime Minister Robert Fico and Deputy Prime Minister Dušan Čap­­lovič. In August 2006, Fico told the media that the alleged attack on Malinová was supposed to topple his administration; this statement clearly indicates that Fico not only had first-hand information on the attack on Malinová but also information on who had organized the attack and about the course of investigation. The last on the list was Čaplovič who in an interview for one weekly magazine in 2007 said that Malinová “may have been battered but not because she was Hungarian”. The Office of Attorney General did not react in any way to proposals made by Kvasnica. PrOINOUINCEcI ilNNOCENT On December 4, 2008, Attorney General Dobroslav Tmka announced that Marcel Grzyb had successfully passed the polygraph test earlier in the month; four days later, he announced that Róbert Benci had successfully passed the polygraph test as well.41 Tmka refused to elaborate on when and where both polygraph tests had been performed. The Office of Attorney General did not even inform the legal counsel of Hedviga Malinová although he was legally entitled to attend the tests; according to Trnka, Kvasnica was not summoned because polygraph test results are not acknow­ledged as evidence before courts of justice in Slovakia anyway. On December 8, 2008, the court accepted the agreement between Róbert Benci and the prosecutor regarding the case of hooliganism in front of Old 324

Next

/
Thumbnails
Contents