Liszka József (szerk.): Az Etnológiai Központ Évkönyve 2000-2001 - Acta Ethnologica Danubiana 2-3. (Dunaszerdahely-Komárom, 2001)
1. Tanulmányok - Borsos Balázs: A magyar nyelvterület számítógép segítségével meghatározott kulturális régiói
Table 2 Statistics of the absence of data (settlements having less than 317 data (50%) are enlisted only in row of decreasing numbers of data absent1) Settlement Coordinates Data absent of 634 1. Hídalmás 281 624 2. Igazfalva 24 r 624 3. Kecskemét 14n 502 4. Új szentes 21s3 474 5. Magyarszentmárton 19s 465 6. Vadász 22o 464 7. Majláthfalva 20ql5 463 8. Nagyszalonta 22n 459 9. Temesrékas 22s 456 10.Gères 26i6 451 11. Gyanta 24n 449 12.Józsefszállás 211 445 13. Ákos 26Ü3 441 14.Ertarcsa 24j 432 15. Vég vár 22t 432 16.Kidé (!) 291 423 17.Magyarszovát (!)30m 418 18.Óvár 13g 405 19.Kisbarcsa (!) 27r8 399 20.Györgyfalva (!) 29n2 395 21.0mor 21u 390 22.Temesság 21 s 13 383 23.Bogdánfalva (§)42m 338 24.Magyarléta (§) 29nl5 337 25.Lozsád (!) 28r 334 26.Zseliz (§) 10h 321 27.Ploszkucén (§) 44o 320 45.Csemakeresztúr (!)21x1 286 1 (!) sign means that the settlement is not a member of the cluster characterized by a lot of 0 data, when we form 9 clusters, but at 39 clusters they form a separate cluster. (§) sign means that the settlement is not a member any of the clusters characterized by a lot of 0 data, due to its great similarity to its closer environment. Going one step further, when 10 clusters are formed (Map 8), we can notice that the value of variance suffers another quite remarkable decrease (4,13-3,55). Now we can see, that the two other more traditional regions, the Highlands and Transylvania remain intact, whereas West Hungary is divided into three, and the Plains into four regions. Besides the north-eastern and eastern part determined before, the middle plain is also divided to a southern (*) and a northern part (3). The line between them runs roughly along the border of Pest county and Bács-Kiskun county. 58
