Folia Theologica et Canonica, Supplementum (2016)
Szabolcs Anzelm Szijromi, O.Praem., Relationship among the Holy See, Czech-, Polish-and Hungarian Kingdoms in the 13"'-14" century
RELATIONSHIP AMONG THE HOLY SEE, CZECH-, POLISH- AND HUNGARIAN KINGDOMS 209 tution 18 of the Council of Lateran IV)63; to the obligation of the clergy to pray the liturgy of hours64 (its detailed description may be found in canons 100-105 of Book II of the Decretum Burchardi, and in the Decretum Gratiani we find orders on this in D. 91 c. 265)“; to the defense of ecclesiastical property from getting into lay ownership67; to the special obligation of the presbyters to promote the salvation of those faithful who are entrusted on them68; to the close- shut custody of the holy oils and of the Holy Eucharist69 (that was prescribed - in the footsteps of the particular orders of the 1 l'h century™ - by twenty constitutions with binding force at the Council of Lateran IV71, and later got also into the Liber Extra72); to the privilegium fori3 (concerning which the universal norm was summed up besides the numerous canons of the Decretum Gratiani74 also in Constitution 48 of the Council of Lateran IV7i and the Liber Extra"')'1', to the canon concerning devotion and authenticity of the saints’ relics78; to the leave of clerics bound to a permission of the ordinary79; to the adjustment of marital cases80; as well as to the right of a patron81, whose rigorous adjustment ° COD 244. Cf. Szuromi, Sz. A., A temetésre vonatkozó egyházfegyelem a XII-XIII. században, Budapest 2007. 117-120. 64 Can. 13: Péterfy, C., Sacra concilia ecclesiae, I. 109. 65 Friedberg 1.317-318. “ Szuromi, Sz. A., The paleo-Christian characteristics of the Catholic priesthood and their effect on Medieval (9'I,-I2"1 century) structures of priestly formation. In Studia Canonica 47 (2013) 467-478. 67 Can. 15: Péterfy, C., Sacra concilia ecclesiae, I. 109. 68 Can. 20: Péterfy, C, Sacra concilia ecclesiae, I. 111. 69 Can. 21 : Péterfy, C., Sacra concilia ecclesiae, I. 1 11. 70 Cf. Browe, P., Die Eucharistic als Zaubermittel im Mittelalter, in Archiv für Kulturgeschichte 20(1930) 134-154. 71 In detailed cf. Izbicki, T., Temeraria manus: Custody of the Eucharist in Medieval Canon Law, in Erdő, P. - Szuromi, Sz. A. (ed.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Congress of Medieval Canon Law. Esztergom, 3 August - 8 August 2008 (Monumenta luris Canonici, C/14), Città del Vaticano 2010. 539-552. Szuromi, Sz. A., Az Eucharisztia őrzésének és tiszteletének egyházjogi előírásai a hatályos latin liturgikus fegyelemben, in Teológia 45 (2011 ) 98-107. 72 X 3.44.1 : Friedberg II. 649. ” Can. 24: Péterfy, C., Sacra concilia ecclesiae, I. 112. 71 C. 11 q. I cc. 1,3.9, 10, 37: Friedberg I. 627-637; cf. C. 11 q. 1 d.p.c. 47: Friedberg I. 641. 75 COD 256-257; cf. X 2.28.61 : Friedberg II. 437^138. 74 X 2. 1.4, 8, 17: Friedberg II. 240-246. 77 About this question cf. Gaudemet, J.. Église et cité. Histoire du droit canonique, Paris 1994. 522. Bónis, Gy., Az egyházi bíráskodás fejlődése a Mohács előtti Magyarországon, in Szent- széki regeszták. Iratok az egyházi bíráskodás történetéhez a középkori Magyarországon (Jog- történeti tár I/1 ), Budapest 1997. 621-658, especially 624-627. Balogh, E„ Középkori bajor egyházi bíráskodás (Bibliotheca Instituti Postgradualis luris Canonici Universitatis Catholicae de Petro Pázmány nominatae III/2), Budapest 2000. 60-71. Szuromi, Sz. A., An Outline of the Ecclesiastical Administration of Justice and Judicial Organization in the High Middle Ages, in Rivista Internazionale di Diritto Comune 22 (2011 ) 279-292, especially 285-287. 78 Can. 27: Péterfy, C., Sacra concilia ecclesiae, I. 112. 79 Can. 31 : Péterfy, C., Sacra concilia ecclesiae, I. 113. 80 Can. 39: Péterfy, C., Sacra concilia ecclesiae, I. 115. 81 Can. 51 : Péterfy, C., Sacra concilia ecclesiae, I. 118-119.
