Matskási István (szerk.): A Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum évkönyve 101. (Budapest 2009)

Pálfy, J.: Review of invertebrate and vertebrate paleontological types in the collection of the Hungarian Natural History Museum

Review ofpaleonotogical types in the HNHM 19 fish, part and counterpart was placed in two different drawers within the Tertiary fish collection. There may be one more twist awaiting in the story of this specimen: a revision might prove it to be neither an echinoid spine, nor part of a fish, as some curators now suggest. Figs 8-14. Photographs of type specimens mentioned in the text. 8 — Beremendia fissidens (PETÉNYI in KUBINYI, 1856), syntype, maxilla, V.61.1585, scale bar 0.5 cm. 9 = Castor ebeczkyi KRENNER, 1867, syntype, right M

2, 2007.304.2., scale bar 0.5 cm. 10 = Mesocetus hungaricus KADIC, 1907, holotype, skull, V.79.1

18, scale bar 20 cm. 11 = Magyarosaurus dacus (NOPCSA, 1915), syntype (also syntype of Magyarosaurus transsylvanicus HUENE, 1932), left fibula, V.60.1709, scale bar 3 cm. 12 = Perumys gyulavarii KRETZOI et VÖRÖS, 1989, holotype, left M

2, V.88.1, occlusal view and 13 — buccal view, note that only the upper part above the fracture was figured in the original description, scale bar 1 cm. 14 = Rhabdocidaris posthumus PÁVAY, 1874, holotype, V.6

1.893, scale bar 2 cm .0 Annls hist.-nat. Mus. natn. hung. 101, 2009