Matskási István (szerk.): A Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum évkönyve 100. (Budapest 2008)

Korsós, Z.: History of the Herpetological Collection of the Hungarian Natural History Museum

they sent them to us, so we would certainly recognise them. It lives nowhere else, only on the rocks ofBulgar-Dagh. The book told us this. We searched for it there and we found it; we now have 20-25 specimens of it." (LENDL 1908, Fig. 16). According to the information kindly provided by Dr WERNER MAYER, Wienna, these specimens are member of the still unclarified Darevskia rudis-valentini species complex. It was LENDL too, who was assigned the renewal of the Budapest Capital's Zoo between 1911 and 1919. He even made sketch plans for housing the Natural History Museum in its own building in 1919, 1920 and in 1931. From these, the beautiful Hungarian "art nouveau" style palace designed to stand on Vérmező was the most enchanting, but unfortunately none of these plans were realised. The lack of space, the crowdedness of the natural history collections became more and more pressing, but the solution did not come for many decades. In 1888, in the building of the National Museum "... the fifth room is occupied by the collection of reptiles, amphibians, and fish. Here are the Hungarian and almost complete species exhibited. Also in this room is the collection of exotic species of snakes, lizards, frogs and fish, mainly collected by Xdntus, Duka, and Machik in East-Asia, and partly sent as a gift by the Smithsonian Institution in Washington." (FRIVALDSZKY J. 1888). According to MEHELY'S data (1902), XÁNTUS first sent 65 "Californian" (probably Mexican) snakes, then 64 amphibians, 98 lizards, 164 snakes and 1 crocodile (altogether 392 specimens) in 1870. TIVADAR DUKA donated 35 East Indian reptiles, IMRE VEREBÉLYI 20 Mexican snakes and frogs and the Museum in Vienna 57 foreign reptiles. GYULA MACHIK'S gift could also be considered as equivalent to these: 54 lizards, 144 snakes, 4 turtles, 12 frogs and 1 crocodile skull (altogether 215 specimens) arrived from him. For the herpetological objects on display, two illustrated guides were written by JENŐ DADAYin 1891 and 1895 (DADAY 1891,1895). In the 2nd edition, even a groundplan of the zoological exhibition hall on the 2nd floor of National Museum was published. It contained 8 rooms connected to each other, 7 of them housing the zoological displays, and one was for the library. There was one room devoted for the fish-amphibian-reptile collection: from the 10 cabinets here 4 contained the amphibians and the reptiles and the rest the fish. According to DADAY's description, these wooden cabinets were fully crowded with alcohol jars on the shelves, on the top and even in the bottom of the cabinets. There were dry preparations, too, both from Hungary and exotic areas. Some of the preparations were quite modernistic in their way of mounting, due to the exploratory taxidermy school of LENDL, the former museum employee, now the head of a self-financing preparatory institute. Instead of the former practice simply to stuff the animal skins into rigid and unnatural poses, LENDL invented a totally new technique more similar to a sculpturesque demonstration (LENDL 1898). Many of the displays made in his workshop could still be acceptable and look natural today. Since 1850 the incoming items were registered regularly in acquisition inventories (see previously). Until the end of 1898, there were only two of these catalogues: one for the vertebrates, and one for the invertebrate animals. Starting with 1899, the curators split their inventories into 10 separate books, from which 5 were for the vertebrates (according to the classes of the animal kingdom; one for the amphibians, one for the reptiles, etc). Unfortunately, the herpetological books perished in the fire of 1956.