Matskási István (szerk.): A Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum évkönyve 82. (Budapest 1990)

Fóthi, E. ; Pap, I.: Changes of way of life during the 6-12th centuries in the territory of Hungary

Table 1. Some oral pathological data of afflicted individuals Series Examined skulls (%) Skulls with caries Skulls with pre-mortem lost teeth (%) Skulls with abscessus (%) 1. Tiszavasvári (6-7th c.) 41 9 (21 95) 12 (29. 27) 7 (17. 07) 2. Kornye (6-7th c. ) 21 13 (61 90) 15 (71. 43) 10 (47. 62) 3. üllo I. (7-Bth c. ) 44 13 (29 55) 23 (52. 27) 8 (18. 18) 4. Ullí II. (7-8th c.) 28 10 (35 71) 20 (71. 43) 11 (39. 29) 5. Alattyán (7-8th c. ) 40 9 (22 50) 25 (62. 50) 13 (32. 50) 6. Fészerlak (8th c. ) 54 34 (62 96) 32 (59. 26) 33 (61. 11) 7. Toponár (8th c .) 33 16 (48 48) 25 (75. 76) 18 (54. 55) 8. Homokmégy [B-9th c.) 31 12 (38 71) 16 (51. 61) 11 (35. 48) 9. Tiszafüred 1 (10th c. ) 32 19 (59 40) 18 (56. 30) 5 (15. 60) 10. Tiszalök (11th c. ) 26 14 (53 85) 20 (76. 92) 14 (53. 85) 11. Szabolcs 1 (10-12th c.) 43 30 (69 80) 26 (60. 50) 10 (23. 00) 12. Zalavár-Kápi3lna2 (11th c. ) 84 50 (59 50) 61 (72. 60) 51 (60. 70) 13. Zalavár-Vár* (9-llth c. ) 108 46 (42 60) 42 (38. 90) 36 (33. 30) 1 PkP 1986 2 FRAYER 1984 Table 2. Some oral pathological data based on the examined teeth Number (*) Number (*) Number (%) Examined Series teeth of carious of pre-mortem of abscessus teeth lost teeth 1. Tiszavasvári 819 16 (1.95) 3 83 (6 63)* 10 (1 22) 3 2. Kornye 417 58 (13.91) 76 (11 80) 17 (4 08) 3. una' I. 613 17 (2.77) 104 (7 61) 12 (1 96) 4. üllő II. 432 16 (3.70) 120 (13 89) 25 (5 79) 5. Alattyán 459 21 (4.58) 225 (18 58) 25 (5 45) 6. Fészerlak 1210 83 (6.86) 273 (16 31) 97 (8 02) 7. Toponár 629 45 (7.15) 205 (20 04) 48 (7 63) 8. Homokmégy . Tiszafüred 360 33 (9.17) 186 (20 04) 23 (6 39) 9. Homokmégy . Tiszafüred 748 59 (7.90) 81 (8 40) 7 (0 90) 10. Tiszalök, Szabolcs 2 402 29 (7.21) 139 (17 27) 22 (5 47) 11. Tiszalök, Szabolcs 2 976 89 (9.10) 115 (8 90) 16 (1 60) 12. Zalavár-Kápolna 996 120 (12.10) 392 (15 50) 165 (16 60) 13. Zalavár-Vár'2 1859 118 (6.40) 170 (5 20) 85 (4 60) PAP 1986 FRAYER 1984 in S of examined teeth number in H of optimal teeth number

Next

/
Thumbnails
Contents