Kaszab Zoltán (szerk.): A Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum évkönyve 69. (Budapest 1977)

Tóth, T.: Neolithic and paleometallic [sic] populations in the Central Danubian Basin

Continuation of Table 2. Characteristics MARTIN'S numbers N 17x 100 48x100 52x 100 54x100 < Series N (1 + 8): 2 17 17 45 Series (1 + 8): 2 17 45 Tisza-Maros, Early (FARKAS, 1975) 85 86.2 47.7 24.1 20.5 Tisza-Maros, Middle (FARKAS, 1975) 35 83.1 51.5 24.8 20.7 Tisza-Maros, Late (FARKAS, 1975) Tápé, Late Period (FARKAS, LIPTÁK 1975) 80 84.5 49.7 24.3 19.0 Tisza-Maros, Late (FARKAS, 1975) Tápé, Late Period (FARKAS, LIPTÁK 1975) 67 84.5 49.3 24.4 18.8 Szőreg, etc. Late (FARKAS, 1975) Aunjetitz, CSSR (JELINEK, 1973) 14 83.9 50.5 24.2 19.4 Szőreg, etc. Late (FARKAS, 1975) Aunjetitz, CSSR (JELINEK, 1973) 65 86.4 48.4 23.3 19.8 Mokrin, Early (FARKAS & LIPTÁK, 1971) 68 85.9 49.6 24.6 20.2 Sarata-Monteoru (MAXIMILIAN, 1962) 46 83.1 49.1 25.2 19.0 CD Noua, Late (NECRESOV & CRISTESCTJ, G 1973) 15 85.0 49.8 25.0 19.5 O u Yamnaya, Early (KONDUKTOROVA, 1973) 7 82.5 51.5 24.9 19.2 m Katakcmbnaya, Middle (KONDUKTOROVA, 1973) 24 83.7 50.4 24.4 18.2 Srubnaya, Late (KONDUKTOROVA, 1973) 19 81.8 50.1 24.0 18.9 Kivutkalns, Early (DENISOVA, 1975) 10 86.5 50.0 25.6 19.4 Narb.-Roussillon (RIQUET, 1970) 41 82.8 49.3 23.9 19.0 Tepe-Hissar 111. (DEBETS, 1957) 50 82.2 51.8 24.6 20.1 Tepe-Hissar 11. (DEBETS, 1957) 7 83.7 53.2 23.6 20.4 Grossbrembach, Early (ULLRICH, 1972) 13 87.9 50.2 24.0 19.2 sider that in the Neolithic Age in the "vasi a bocca quadrata" culture of the Po Basin, the Danubian (and partly from the Tisza Basin) cultures had an influence and that these influences reached the environs of the Western Alps (MONGAIT 1973) and also we consider the above discussed analogies then it is not without support to assume that the morphogenetic trends in many cases crossed the paths of cultural relationships. The development of the morphogenetic trends was determined by the mutual exchange of autochthon and immigrated groups, which may have occurred independently from commercial relations as the effect of various other (economic, socio-hygienic or geological) factors. Thus, special attention should be paid, for example, to the fact that in the Toscanán Aeneolithic Age the oriental cultural effects (CORRAIN & PARENTI 1973) might have been parallel with the morphological characteristics describing populations from the Central Danubian Basin and the Upper Dnester. On the basis of applied comparative studies in the Central Danubian Basin during the Neolithic, Copper and Bronze Age, we may establish two principal (SE-NW and NE-SW) trends (Figs. 3 and 4). Besides from the end of the Copper Age till the beginning of the Late Bronze Age repeated infiltrations occurred into the population of the southern Great Plain from the belt of the Ukrainian Yamnaya and Katakombnaya cultures which manifested in a decrease of gracility. 23 Természettudományi Múzeum Évkönyve 1977.