Kaszab Zoltán (szerk.): A Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum évkönyve 69. (Budapest 1977)
Tóth, T.: Neolithic and paleometallic [sic] populations in the Central Danubian Basin
Continuation of Table 1. Characteristics MARTIW'S 05 bo numbers N 17X100 48X100 52 X lun 54X100 < Series N (1 +8):2 17 17 45 Tisza-Maros Early (FARKAS, 1975) 70 85.9 51.6 23.7 20.0 Tisza-Maros, Middle (FARKAS, 1975) Tisza-Maros, Late (FARKAS, 1975) 37 84.4 50.3 24.0 18.8 Tisza-Maros, Middle (FARKAS, 1975) Tisza-Maros, Late (FARKAS, 1975) 84 84.7 50.8 24.0 19.7 Tápé, Late (FARKAS & LIPTÁK, 1975)* 72 84.9 50.5 23.9 19.8 Szőreg, etc. Late (FARKAS, 1975) 12 85.0 51.3 24.1 19.6 Aunjetitz, ÖSSR (JELINEK, 1973) 120 87.3 48.9 22.0 19.5 Mokrin, Early (FARKAS, & LIPTÁK, 1971) 55 87.5 48.8 22.6 19.4 Sarata-Monteoru (MAXIMILIAN, 1962) 48 85.5 49.3 24.0 18.3 Noua, Late (NECRASOV & CRISTESCU, N 1973) 15 83.8 53.2 24.3 19.4 G Yamnaya, Early (KONDUKTOROVA, 1973) 37 84.3 50.2 22.8 17.8 S Katakombnaya, Middle (KONDUKTOROS VA 1973) 53 82.7 52.2 23.7 18.5 Srubnaya, Late (KONDUKTOROVA, 1973) 34 85.3 51.6 23.8 18.0 Kivutkalns, Early (DENISOVA, 1975) 35 85.8 51.2 24.5 18.2 Narb.-Roussillon (RIQUET, 1970) 50 81.8 51.9 23.8 18.3 Tepe-Hissar III. (DEBETS, 1957)** 86 83.8 51.8 23.7 19.8 Tepe-Hissar II. (DEBETS, 1957)** 9 84.0 52.1 23.4 20.0 Grossbrembach, Early (ULLRICH, 1972) 26 86.9 49.8 22.4 18.8 Rhein, Early Period (RIQUET, 1970) 13 87.4 48.8 22.6 18.4 Bas-Languedoe, Early (RIQUET, 1970) 21 81.8 50.8 22.8 16.8 garian Baden culture to the male groups of the Early Bronze Age Mokrin, furthermore, to the Sarata-Monteoru both as far as special indices and diameters are concerned. The Czechoslovakian Aunjetitz group reflects a comparative nearness to the Mokrin series. The male groups of the Mid-Bronze Age in the Tisza-Maros region and of the Ukrainian Yamnaya cultures are close to each other as far as special indices are concerned, but differ when diameters are concerned, since the southern Great Plain group is more gracile. The summed up Late Bronze Age group in the Tisza-Maros region also includes the Tápé series, which with some other finds (Szőreg, Deszk) displays significant similarities approached from the aspect of the special index. On the other hand, FARKAS (1975) indicates that in the Late Bronze Age there was an immigration of a male population having dolichocranial characteristics, but the same process may not be proved for a west-eastern direction. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that the male group of Tápé reflects morphological nearness mainly with the Czeshoslovakian Aunjetitz culture and the Glockenbecher series (Table 1). As regards the finds of the female groups, the following may be stated: the Neolithic female series of the Tisza— Maros region is autochthonous with Mesolithic origin, since as far as diameter data are concerned it significantly differs from the Dnepro-Donets culture, in fact, this female series is more gracile than the latter. It should be noted that the Copper Age female population from the southern * Calculated by the author of the present paper ** Re-examined and calculated by G. F. DEBETS in Philadelphia, in 1957
