Szekessy Vilmos (szerk.): A Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum évkönyve 62. (Budapest 1970)
Bottyán, O.: The variations of the palatum with respect to sexual dimorphism I.
A sexual dimorphism can indubitably be established. However, the difference between the male and female mean values, that is, the rate of sexual dimorphism is in every case smaller than the respective deviation. Since the determination of sex based on merely one character at a 5 per cent probability level requires that —given a normal distribution—the difference between the male and female mean values be 3.92 times greater than the deviation, the values of the sexual dimorphism determined with respect to the research material will clearly imply that these absolute measurements and indices, alone and unequivocally, cannot be used for the determination of sex. Concerning the research material, sexual dimorphism is significant as regards the correlation between width and depth, but this feature cannot in practice be applied for this purpose, even if this significance holds also for other samples. As regards changes depending on age, essential differences can —aside of small-rate and therefore uncertain alterations —be established only for the infant and juvenile age groups, manifested in the lower values of the absolute measurements and the slightly higher value of the palatal indices. References: AJTEKCEEB, B. IT. H AEEEII, T. O.: KpaHHOMerpHH (Hayna, MocKBa, 1964, CTp. 63). — BÂTAI, E. : A váchartyáni avar temető csontvázleleteinek embertani vizsgálata (Le cimetière avar de Váchartyán) (Ann. Hist. nat. Mus. Nat. Hung., Ser. nov. 2, 1952, p. 213-224). — BOTTYÁN, L. O.: An Analysis of the Palatal Measuring Methods (Ann. Hist.-nat. Mus. Nat. Hung., 60, 1968, p. 297-306). — BOTTYÁN, L. O.: On the Problem of Correlation between the Alveolar Profile Angle and some Maxillary Indices (Ann. Hist.-nat. Mus. Nat. LIung. Gl, 1969, p. 211-217). - BROTHWELL, D. R.: Digging up Bones (London, 1963, p. 1192). — CAMPBELL, T. D.: Dentition and Palate of the Australian aboriginal (Adelaide, 1925, p. 1-123). - DEZSŐ, GY., ÉRY, K. K., HARSÁNYI, L., HUSZÁR, GY., NEMESKÉRI, J., NOZDROVICZKY, Sz., THOMA, A., TÓTH, T.,& WENGER, S.: Die spätmittelalterliche Bevölkerung von Fonyód (Anthr. Hung., 6, 1963, p. 1-166). — ÉRY, K. K.: The Osteological Data of the IXth Century Population of Ártánd (Anthr. Hung., 7, 1966, p. 86-116). — ÉRY, K. K.: An Anthropological Study of the Late Avar Period Population of Ártánd (Ann. Hist.-nat Mus. Nat. Hung., 59, 1967, p. 405-484). — ÉRY, K. K.: Reconstruction of the Xth Century Population of Sárbogárd on the Basis of Archeological and Anthropological Data (Alba Regia, 8-9, 1967-68, p. 93-147). — ÉRY, K. K.: Anthropological Studies on a Tenth Century Population at Kál, Hungary, (Anthr. Hung., 9, 1970, p. 9—62). — HEINTZ, N.: Nouvelles mesures du palais (Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d'Anthropologie de Paris, 2, XI, 4, 1961, pp. 416-423). — LÍPTÁK, P.: L'analyse typologique de la population de Kérpuszta au Moyen age (In: NEMESKÉRI, J., LÍPTÁK, P., SZŐKE, B. : Le cimetière du XI siècle de Kérpuszta (Acta Arch. Hung., 3, 1953, p. 303-370). — LÍPTÁK, P.: Kecel környéki avarok (Biol. Közi., 1954, 2, p. 159-164). — LÍPTÁK, P.: Recherces anthropologiques sur les ossements Avares des environs d'Üllő (Acta Arch. Hung. G, 1955, p. 231-316). — LÍPTÁK, P.: Homokmégyhalom avarkori népessége (Biol. Közi., 4, 1956, p. 25-45). — LÍPTÁK, P.: Awaren und Magyaren im DonauTheiss Zwischenstromgebiet (Acta Arch. Hung., 8, 1957, p. 264-268). - LÍPTÁK, P. & FARKAS, GY. : Anthropological Analysis of the Árpádien Age Population of Orosháza-Rákóczi telep (Acta Univ. Szegediensis 8, 1962, p. 222-233). — LÍPTÁK, P.: A magyarság etnogenezisének paleoantropologiája (doktori értekezés, 1967, p. 117). — MARTIN,' R. : Lehrbuch der Anthropologie IL (Jena, 1928, I—III). — MARTIN, R., SALLER, K.: Lehrbuch der Anthr. in svstematischer Darstellung (Stuttgart, 1959, p. 1393 1402). - MIDDLETON-SHAW, J. C.: The Teeth, the Bony Palate and the Mandible in Bantu Races of South Africa (Johannesburg, 1931, p. 1-134). — NEMESKÉRI, J. & GASPARD Y, G. : Megjegyzések a magyar őstörténet embertani vonatkozásaihoz (Ann. Hist.-nat. Mus. Nat. Hung., 5,1954, p. 486-526). — NEMESKÉRI, J. & DEÁK, M.: A Mohács-cselei XIV-XV. századi temető népességének embertani elemzése (Arch. Ért. 83, 1-2, 1956, p. 52-65). — OLIVIER, G.: Pratique Anthropologique (Paris, 1960, p. 144-145). — PATURET, G.: Traite d' Anatomie Humaine (Paris, 1951, Tom. I. p. 236). — POIRIER, P. & SHARPY, A. : Traite d'Anatomie Humaine (Paris,