Szekessy Vilmos (szerk.): A Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum évkönyve 57. (Budapest 1965)

Móczár, L.: Remarks of some types of Drynini and Gonatopodini (Hymenoptera)

bicolor HAL., sous le nom de pedes tris DALM." The data of the specimen in Coll. Hung. Nat. Hist. Mus. are as follow,;: „NF6/2 5" (New Forest and probably: June 1825 or 1852 after the kind information of Prof.RICH ARDS). This specimen is therefore not lost as supposed by RICHARDS (1939 p. 207), and should be regarded as the holotype (Fig. 51) (right tarsi on slide, segments 5—6 of antennae and right +;

bia missing). The holotype corresponds with KIEFFER'S diagnosis, but length is not exactly given, as corrected later by KIEFFER namely, 3—4 mm (1914 p. 75), it isin fact 3.8 mm. It is not possible to identify this specimen by KIEFFER'S key (1906 p. 73); „1. Mediales Scherenglied gerade... 2". „Glieder des Vordertarsus wie bei D. dichromus"; this is not so, but metatarsus : segment 2—5: enlarged claw= 13 : 2 : 4 : 10 : 17 : 14, According to RICHARD'S description (1939 p. 205) based on the examination of numerous specimens, the number of the lamellae differ between 7 — 8 — 9, together with some other morphological and colour characters. The holotype differs only in the following features from RICHARD'S redescription: posterior side of ocellar triangle not „two-third as long as the other two sides", but nearly equal (6 : 7, 100 x); p. 206: metathorax+propodeum in dorsal view not „one and two-thirds times as long as broad'" (that is 45:27), but shorter: 40 : 27 ; enlarged claw with not „nine broad lamellae" but only with 7; tarsal segment 5 not ..with moderately broad lamellae" but with sharpened ones (Fig. 52, slide made by BÍRÓ). Further data: POL : OOL = 6 : 21 (X 100) ocelli in an acute angle. Mandibles with 4teeth: maxillary palpi with 4 (2+ 2) segments (Fig. 53), labial palpi with 2 (Fig. 54). Antennái segments 1—10= 8 : 5 : 13 : 8 : - : - : 6 : 5 : 5 : 8. Head strongly rounded behind eyes (Fig. 51). Pronotum: mesonotum : scutellum : metanotum + propodeum = 22 : 9 : 4 : 28. Metatarsus of fore legs: segment 2—5: enlarged claw = 13 : 2 : 4 : 10 : 18 : 13. Length: breadth of fore trochanter = 17 : 5. Tibial spurs 1, 0,1. Due to the pronotal impression and the other characters this species belongs to the genus Pseudogonatopus and not to Dicondylus as given by KIEFFER. ig. 51. Pseudogonatopus distinctus (KIEFFEH) I'seudogonatopus ortholahis (KIEFFER) Gonatopus ortholabis KIEFFER, 1906, Spec. Hym., 9, p. 506 Q Gonatopus ortholabis: 1907, KIEFFER, Gen. Insect., 54, p. 21 Dicondylus ortholabis: 1914, KIEFFER, Das Tierreich, 41, p. 74 Dicondylus ortholabis: 1928, BERLAND, Faune de France, 19, p. 146 As localities, the following data are given by KIEFFER for this species: „Partie. Ucciani (Collection de MARSHALL)".The data of the specimen in Coll. Hung. Nat. Hist. Mus. agree with the localities : „Ucciani", „nigriventris Coll. MARSHALL" in KIEFFER'S writing, „nigriventris varß", „237", „Dicondylus ortholabis K. typ." (red) in BIRÓ'S