Hedvig Győry: Mélanges offerts a Edith Varga „Le lotus qui sort de terre” (Bulletin du Musée Hongrois des Beaux-Arts Supplément 1. Budapest, 2001)

ANDREY O. BOLSHAKOV: Osiris in the Forth Dynasty Again? The false door of 'Intj, MFA 31.781

scene is by no means an early phenomenon. The false doors having this fea­ture are not earlier at Giza than the mid-Fifth Dynasty: a) Nfr-htp(.w), reigns of Niuserra - Unis. 25 The owner is depicted standing, the rest of the panel is covered by his titles. 26 b) S$m(J)-nfr(.w) III, G 5150, northern false door, reign of Isesi. 27 The owner is depicted sitting, the rest of the panel is covered by his titles. 28 c) Z>-jb(.j), G2092+2093, reigns of Isesi - Unis. 29 The owner is depicted standing, the rest of the panel is covered by his titles. 30 d) Hlgj, G 2352, the end of the Fifth Dynasty or later. 31 The owner is depict­ed standing, the rest of the panel is covered by his titles. 32 e) W}S-ki(.j)/Jrj, false door found by D.110 and Dill, middle Fifth Dynasty or later. 33 The owner is depicted standing, the rest of the panel is covered by his titles. 34 j) Hnw, unfinished northern false door, middle Fifth Dynasty or later. 35 The owner is depicted sitting, a figure of a standing attendant (?) occupies the rest of the panel. 36 g) SSm(.j)-nfr(.w), middle Fifth Dynasty or later. 37 The owner is sitting; a figure of a standing mortuary priest occupies the rest of the panel. 3S h) Hmw and Spss-k3.f­r nh(.w), southern false door of Spss-kl.f­r nh(.w), late Fifth Dynasty or later. 39 The upper part of the panel is lost, on the lower part there are legs of the owner standing, the rest of the panel is occupied by his name. 40 23 Harpur, op. cit. (note 3), p. 268:756. 26 Hassan, Excavations at Giza IX, Le Caire 1960, fig.28-a. 27 PMIW, 153; Harpur, op. cit. (note 3), p. 270:234; cf. Junker, Giza III, Wien-Leipzig 1938, p. 14. 28 Junker, op. cit. (note 27), Taf. 1 ; E. Brunner-Traut, Die altägyptische Grabkammer-Seschemnofers III. aus Gisa, 2. Aufl., Mainz 1982, Farbtaf. 5-6. 25 Roth, op. cit. (note 5), pp. 36, 109 (cf. PM III2, p. 70 - Sixth Dynasty). 311 Roth, op. cit. (note 5), pl.71-i>, fig. 179. 31 PMIW, p. 84. 32 W. K. Simpson, Giza Mastabas IV: The Mastabas of Western Cemetery I, Boston 1980, pi. 57-6, fig. 45. " The dating is based on the typology of the false door ("Giza type", see footnote 17). PM IIP, p. 114 offers a very indef­inite dating: Fifth - Sixth Dynasty. H Junker, Giza IX, Wien 1950, fig. 40. 35 The dating is based on the typology of the false doors ("Giza type", see note 17). PM III 2 , p. 279 offers a very indefinite dating: Fifth - Sixth Dynasty. '" S. Hassan, Excavations at Giza III, Cairo 1941, fig. 48. " The dating is based on the typology of the false door ("Giza type", see note 17). PM III 2 , p. 279 offers a very indefinite dating: Fifth - Sixth Dynasty. •'" Hassan, op. cit. (note 36), fig. 212. 59 PMIIF, p. 245. * Hassan, op. cit. (note 2), fig. 69.

Next

/
Thumbnails
Contents