Kovács Tibor - Stanczik Ilona (szerk.): Bronze Age tell settlements of the Great Hungarian Plain I. (Inventaria Praehistorica Hungariae 1; Budapest, 1988)

Tibor KOVÁCS: Review of the Bronze Age settlement research during the past one and a half centuries in Hungary

FÜZESABONY-ÖREGDOMB (6) CL 1976 b. 50 m

2 c. 240 cm d. Füzesabony culture e. I. STANCZIK 1978. GÁBORJÁN-CSAPSZÉKPART (18) a. 1971-1972 ft. 57 m

2 c. 140-200 cm d. Tiszapolgár culture, Nyírség culture, Gyulavarsánd culture e. M. SZ. MÁTHÉ, Tells in the Berettyó Valley. - See in this volume. JÁSZDÓZSA-KÁPOLNAHALOM (9) a. 1966-1969, 1973-1975 b. 294 m

2 c. 540 cm d. Hatvan culture, Füzesabony culture e. I. STANCZIK 1982. KLÁRAFAL VA -HAJDO VA (22) a. 1969 b. 24 m

2 c. 270 cm d. Maros culture e. O. TROGMAYER, RégFüz Ser I. No 22 (1969) 13; 23 (1970) 8-9; ArchÉrt 97 (1970) 306. TISZAFÜRED-ÁSOTTHALOM (14) a. 1964 b. 40 m

2 c. 300-320 cm d. Alföld Linear Pottery culture, Baden culture, Hatvan culture, Füzesabony culture e. T. KOVÁCS, RégFüz Ser I. No 18 (1965) 22; Arch Ért 100 (1973)260-261. TISZALUC-DANKADOMB (4) a. 1957,1960 b. 80 m

2 c. 300 cm d. Nyírség culture, Htavan culture e. N. KALICZ 1968,72-73, 114-115. TISZA UG-KÉMÉNYTETÖ (11 ) a. 1980-1982 b. 380 m

2 c. 245 cm d. Nagyrév culture, Hatvan culture e. M. R. CSÁNYI - I. STANCZIK 1982. TÓSZEG-LAPOSHALOM (10) La. 1948 b. 55-60 m

2 c. 490 cm d. Nagyrév culture, Hatvan culture, Füzesabony culture e. J. CSALOG 1952; A. MOZSOLICS 1952; S. BÖKÖNYI 1952; S. SÁRKÁNY 1952. J. STIEBER 1952. H.a. 1973-1974 b. 40 m

2 c. 490 cm d. Nagyrév culture, Hatvan culture, "Füzesabony period" e. I. STANCZIK 1979-80; I. BONA 1979-80. TÖRÖKSZENTMIKLÓS-TEREHALOM (13) a. 1969 b. 16 m

2 c. 410 cm d. Hatvan culture, Gyulavarsánd culture e. I. FODOR, RégFüz Ser I. No 23 (1970) 20. TÜRKE VE-TEREHALOM (12) a. 1985 b. 400 m

2 c. — d. Füzesabony, Gyulavarsánd and Szó'reg type pottery e. M. CSÁNYI, RégFüz Ser I. No 39 (1986) 31-32; ArchÉrt 113 (1986)270. VÉSZTÖ-MÁGORIHALOM (20) a. 1972-1976 b. 220-230 m

2 c. 500—650 cm (Bronze Age: 160 cm) d. Szakáihát group, Tisza culture, Tiszapolgár culture, Gyulavarsánd culture e. K. HEGEDŰS, RégFüz Ser I. No 26 (1973) 25-26; 27 (1974) 21-24; 28 (1975) 32-33; 29 (1976) 21-22; 30 (1977) 15, ArchÉrt 101 (1974)310-311; 102 (1975) 295; 104 (1977) 264. NOTES 1 The first major work that is also useful archaeologically was published by L. F. MARSIGLI (Marsilius), an Italian natural scientist and military engineer, who spent a longer period of time in Hungary at the turn of the 17 th and 18th centuries. 2 A survey of early maps with good historical and archaeological information is given by VILMOS BALÁS (1961, 32—36). 3 The appeal for the registration and conservation of monuments in 1847 and 1858 practically only concerned monuments and burial mounds-the so-called Cumanian mounds-thought to be medieval. The unpublished - and thus practically untappedgazetteer compiled by FRIGYES PESTHY (1864) based on the information from 1863 contains a wealth of data on hillforts and fortified settlements. The history of the research of hillforts has been surveyed by GYULA NOVÁKI (1963). His excellent, pioneering study-that is only available in Hungarian-is a great aid to all scholars active in this field. 4 This is especially true of the Roman Age, and of the often misinterpreted early history of the Hungarian tribes, as well as of various periods of medieval history. These latter often came into the hmelight of interest and 'scholarly debates' in their romantic