Technikatörténeti szemle 23. (1997-98)
TANULMÁNYOK - Vámos Éva Katalin: Women’s Opportunities of Studying and Practising Engineering in Hungary from 1895 to 1968 (On the example of Budapest Technical University and its women students)
74 TBUY, p. 180-181. 75 TBUY, p. 189. 76 TBUY, p. 225-228; 232-234 and 234-238. 77 TBUY, p. 237-238 and 234-236. (Data not shown in Table 5). 78 TBUY, p. 236-237. (Data not shown in Table 5). 79 TBUY, p. 230-231; 233-234 and 240. 80 See Footnote 22. Compiled by the author from TBUY, pp. 30-59. 81 Only engineering departments are included in the figures; part-time working people are counted as full-time staff. 82 As with Budapest Technical University, not all the staff have engineering degrees. In contrast to BTUY, TBUY exactly indicates the qualifications and degrees of those on the staff. However, all graduated people participating in tuition and research had to be included as such, irrespective of the kind of university they have graduated from. 83 Departments employing female teaching & scientific staff at the Faculty of Building Engineering were: Building Contracting (1), History of Architecture (5), Design of Public Buildings (1), Designing of Residential Buildings (1), Statics and Support (3) and City-Planning (1) TBUY, p. 31-33, 36-39. 84 Departments employing female teaching & scientific staff at the Faculty of Civil Engineering were: Building Materials (3), Upper Geodesy (1), Photogrammetry (3), Geotechnology (1) , Experimental Physics (3), Architectural Engineering (3), Mathematics (4), Mechanics (2) , Management of Water Supplies (2). TBUY, p. 48-55, 58-59. 85 Stephan Gazda Jr. In: Technikatörténeti Szemle, Vol. VIII. 1975-76. Népművelési Propaganda Iroda 1976. p. 273-279. 86 TBUY, p. 92. 87 Compiled by the author from TBUY, pp. 66-114. 88 TBUY, 89 TBUY, 90 TBUY, 91 TBUY, 92 TBUY, 93 TBUY, 94 TBUY, 95 TBUY, 96 TBUY, 97 TBUY, 98 TBUY, 101 TBUY, 102 TBUY, p. 111-114. 103 Compiled by the author from the lists of students. TBUY, p. 181-191. The list does not specify the form of tuition (regular, evening or correspondence). The number of students as it can be calculated from the list are in disagreement with those to be found on p. 17 of TBUY for regular students graduated in the year investigated. (The figure given for regular students [494] and also those given for the individual faculties are lower than those resulting from adding up the names in the list, so it must be assumed that the latter include also the students from evening and correspondence courses. The table on p. 17 does not indicate the students' genders and is thus useless for our purposes.) 104 TBUY, p. 17. p68. p68. p74. p75-76. p77. p. 80-81. p81-82. p88-89. p90-93. p94. p95-96. p97. p103. p108.
