Társadalomtörténeti múdszerek és forrástípusok. Salgótarján, 1986. szeptember 28-30. - Rendi társadalom, polgári társadalom 1. - Adatok, források és tanulmányok a Nógrád Megyei Levéltárból 15. (Salgótarján, 1987)
Angol nyelvi összefoglalók (English Summaries)
568 regiment was organized on the 1st of January 1706 in the Rhenish basin. The four hundred Hussars of this regiment originated predominantly from Hungary. The king of France gave the hitherto Saint-Germain regiment under the command of colonel György Ráttky. Count László Bercsényi recruited Hussars among the Hungraians who lived in the Ottoman Empire. The regiment was set up in 1721-22. This military unit under the name of the First Hussar Regiment existed up to the twentieth century. The royal patent issued by the king of France on the 25th of January 1735 entrusted Count József Bálint Esterházy with the work of the organization of the new Hussar regiment. The number of the Hungarian deserters especially increased during the period of the war of the Austrian succession. First of all, the former kurucs of Thököly's and Rákóczi's uprisings and their descendants were the commanders in charge in the Hussar regiments of the French army. The Hungarian solders in the French army were named as Hussars and kurucs interchangeably . The number of the Hussars in the French army reached the peak in the age of the American revolution. A few small military unites of the Hussars also participated in it. At the end of the eighteenth century three new Hussar regiments were added to the previous three ones but Hungarians can be rarely found in these new regiments. Basically, the system of the French recruitment changed the special national character of the Hussar regiments in France. JÁNOS MAZ5U : The Integrative Mobility towards the Intellectuals in Hungary during the Era of the Dual Monarchy. (The Sources and Methodological Problems of Macro-Structural Research.) The author focuses on the historical formation of the Hungarian intellectuals and their social origins during the second part of the nineteenth century. The first part of Mr. Mazsu's essay outlines the questions and methodology of his research. The censuses of the Hungarian population during the second part of the nineteenth century did not enumerate the social origins of the intellectuals as well as their parents'; the national surveys of these are not at our disposal. The only way for the research of the integrative mobility towards intellectuals seems to be the analysis of the educational statistics. Because the system of the secondary education in Hungary, in opposition to its Western European counterparts, rigidly expressed the social stratification and the studentry was trained there mainly to the intellectual occupations, this documents give opportunity of the analysis of the educational inequality and the chances and margins of the social mobility. The second part of Mr. Mazsu's essay presents the survey of the statistical data and the research method. The author comes to the conclusion that the comparative analysis of the constituting elements of the social status - for example, occupation, the financial situation, nationality, religion, and etc. -is not possible on the basis of the aggregate statistical data. Additionally, the abstract sectorial categories of the occupational statistics have only broad connection with the historical and societal stratification of the Hungarian society in the era of the Dual Monarchy. To overcome these methodological problems is only feasible by means of the methodology of the micro-analysis of
