1850. ÉVI ERDÉLYI NÉPSZÁMLÁLÁS (1994)

HELYNÉVMUTATÓ

198. NOTES 1. Lajos Thirring: Data and data sources of the people's conscription regarding the not noble population from the first half of the nineteenth century (Data compilation from Gusztav Thirring's legancy.) Historical Statistical Communications, 1959, 1-2, p. 132-181. 2. Zsolt Trocsanyi: The National Statistical Office of 1848-1849. Statistical Review, 1955, No. 3, p. 216-229. 3. National Law and Government Gazetta regarding the crown land of Transylvania. Piece: 5. Published and distributed on May 12, 1850, p. 42-62. - For Hungary the population census was ordered somewhat earlier by Geringer, "the imperial commissioner empowered with full rights with regard to civil matters." Published: in Law and Government Gazette regarding Hungary, year 1, Buda, 1850. p. 105-123. 4. The same is said in the instruction regarding Hungary in a somewhat easier style: "The aim of the official population census is to provide a certain basis for the acual replenishment of the army, for community needs, for internal public administration and for the simple knowledge of the country." 5. Interestingly, the 1977 Roumanian population census also returned to these two categories. This time however the number of the Szekelys was comletely insignificant and their data were included into the rubric of "those of other nationalities". 6. Elek Fenyes: The present state of Hungary and of the provinces annexed to it in statistical and geographical aspects. Pest, volumes L-vi and other works. 7. With regard to the practice of separation no answer was received either from the most recent summary. Cf.; Carl. Gollner: Die Siebenburgische Milit'drgrenze, 1762-1851, Munich, 1974. 8. In the literature there are alternating references to the 1850 and, respectively, 1851 population census. (:Cf.: Alfred Lengyel: The results of the 1851 population census in the county of Gyor. Historical Statistical Communications, 1858, No. 1-2.) Since the population census was both ordered and prepared in 1850 and for 1851 only the summarization and the publication of the data remained, the designation "1850" is regarded as more appropriate. 9. Mittheilungen aus dem Gebiete der Statistik. I. Jahrgang, 1. Heft. Wien, 1851. - II. Jahrgang, 1. Heft. Zur Statistik des Grossfiirstentums Siebenbiirgen. Wien, 1853. 10. E. A. Bielz: Handbuch des Landeskunde Siebenbiirgens Hermannstadt, 1857. p. 613. 11. M. O. L. F. 551. 12. For example, in the final summary, the total number of those belonging to all nationalities was 1,061,556 and the total number of those belonging to all religions on the basis of the distribution by religions was 2,061,655 neither of which was equal to the size of the civil population which was 2,061,645. 13. Laszlo Kovari: The statistics of the country of Transylvania. Kolozsvar, 1847. - Karoly Benko: The description of Csik, Gyergyo and Kaszon. Kolozsvar, 1853 . - Ignaz Lenk von Treuenfeld: Siebenbiirgens georgraphisch-topographisch-statistisch-hydrographisch-und ortographisches Lexicon... Wien, 1839. Bd. 1-4. - Sollner, J.: Statistik des Grossfiirstentums Siebenbiirgens. Hermannstadt, 1849. 14. Wagner, Ernst: Histrorisch-statistisches Ortsnamenbuch fur Siebenbiirgen, Koln-Wien, 1977. 15. Suijiu, Corolian: Dictionar istoric al localitatilor din Transilvania, Bucuresti, 1967, T. 1-2. 16. Karte von Siebenbiirgen nach der mit a. h. Entschliessung vom 12. May. 1851. genehmigten definitiven Landeseintheilung. Grav. Dimitrovits. 17. Edelenyi-Denes Szabo: Changes in the areas of constituencies and municipalities in Hungary, Statistical Review, 1928, No. 6, p. 648-714. 18. The places of the First Roumanian Regiemnt with only military population: Kis Barcsa, Ohaba, 6 Sinka, Oslat, Oslater, Holzschlag,<5 Tohan, Rakovicza, Sinna, Szunyogszek, Vad. 19. Bielz o. c., p. 148. - Its source: Allgemeine Reichsgesetzblatt fur das Jahr 1854. Stuck LI. Nro. 141. - There are no data as to the size fo the military population. 20. After the two Roumanian regiments ceased' to exist and Fogaras was separated the data changed in the following way. The sources of historical statistics, Budapest, 1957, p. 388. (On the basis of the Tafeln zur Statistik der Osterreichischen Monarchie. Erroneously Carlburg was identified with Nagykaroly, instead of Gyulafhervar1) The district of Fogaras 65,754 The district of Gyulafehervar 449,677 The district of Kolozsvar 423,069 The district of Nagyszeben 494,164