Múzeumi műtárgyvédelem 3., 1976 (Múzeumi Restaurátor És Módszertani Központ)

A képek jegyzéke

LIST OF TABLES Table I. Fig. 1: Balf. Mural detail in the spa chapel, by Stephan Dorfmeister, from 1799, before restoration. Fig. 2: The same after restoration Fig. 3: On the photo of a smaller detail about the cleaned decorative paint it is well visible that the motifs are without any plasticity Fig. 4: The through retouching restored plasticity is smaller than it could have been originally, but in consequence of the over-all shabbiness of the surface its intensifying was not possible. Table II. Fig. 5: Hidegség. Mural detail from the 13th century. The gaps on the surface were caused by the so called "picling", the purpose of which was that the later replastering should held better. Fig. 6: Velemér. Mural detail of' John Aquila, from 1377. Intentionally damaged faces. The majority of the faces on the painted figures in the church were similarly damaged. Table III. Fig. 7: Maconka. Drawing of a fragmental mural of the 14th century on the eastern wall of the chancel. The white spots indicate to the crackles, gaps in the deeper coat of the plaster where the surface level had to be restored by stuffing. Fig. 8: By the lined retouching of many and relatively large sized stuffing it became possible to put into shape an unbroken, unified fragment. Fig. 9: The eastern wall of the chancel after restoring. Table IV. Fig. 10: Intentionally damaged faces after the stuffing. Fig. 11: Striated completion. Table V. Fig. 12: The Annunciation Altar of Kisszeben on an exhibition in the Museum of Applied Arts in the thirties of this century. Table VI. Fig. 13: Front elevation of the predella before restoration.- 265 -

Next

/
Thumbnails
Contents