Notitia hungáriae novae historico geographica (Budapest, 2012)

Sopron vármegye

INTRODUCTION

37

5: Transcript by Johann Wilhelm Deccard.35 It was made from the manuscript sent to the county authorities’ control (G), eventually from the copy identical with it.36 6:1743.37

K

1: EFK Hist. I. zz.

2: Pars Specialis.

3: 45 [731] ff. 370x235 mm.

4: Description of Sopron city from the description of Sopron county.

5: Fair copy by an unknown hand. It was made from the corrected version of the manuscript sent to the county revision (G2). Bél supplemented, completed the manuscript considerably (K2), mainly with the observations of Haynóczi ([Ha]) and with the documents sent by him.38 Probably this fair copy was made for Haynóczi himself. Bél used in this manuscript the autobiography of Kristóf Lackner that he had received in the meantime - eventually from János Kristóf Deccard.39 6: After 1743 (cf. [Ha]).

[Ha]

1: EFK Hist. I. bbb if. 16-34v.

2: Observationes ad historiam civitatis Sopron.40

3:19 ff. 210x165 mm.

4: Observations of Dániel Haynóczi, Lutheran rector from Sopron, concerning the description of Sopron city by Bél.41 5: Dániel Haynóczi’s own handwriting. Perhaps he saw the manuscript that was sent to the county assembly for revision (G) and he wrote his observations based on that;42 but it is more likely, that he received the manuscript K for revision. Bél used a great part of it (cf. K).

6:1743.43

1: [Hist. I. uu.]

2: [Comitatus Soproniensis]

3: [448 p.]

4: Description of Sopron county.

35 On the title page of the manuscript: “Possessor Ioann. Guiliel. Deccardus M. Doctor m. propria Anno 1743.”

36 Tóth 2001.238. About the relationship of Deccard and Bél see also Kincses 2001.218-219.

37 Cf. the note 35.

38 Tóth 2001.239,242-243, 252-253. Also see Tóth 2006b 245-252.

39 See Lackner 2008. 33. For the relationship of János Kristóf Deccard and Bél see also Kincses 2001. 212, 218, and most recently in Kincses 2011. 406-408.

40 Title given by László Szelestei N. Cf. Szelestei 1984. nr. 228.

41 See in Tóth 2001. 234-235,252., also in Tóth 2006b 242-245.

42 See Tóth 2001.238-239.

43 Ibid. 242.