Dr. Éva Murai szerk.: Miscellanea Zoologica Hungarica 3. 1985 (Budapest, 1985)
Forró, L.; Dussart, B.: Copepoda taxa described by E. Daday, together with a catalogue of pertinent material in the Hungarian Natural History Museum
53. Canthocamptus tentaculatus 1893 13: 143-144 = incertae sedis 17 : 6-7, figs 6-14 (LANG, 1948) _18: 168- 170, figs 113-121 20: 243, 2 50 24: 5 *54. Canthocamptus Treforti 1894 4: 25-29, figs 1-9 = Nitocra lacustris (Schmankewitch. 1875) _5: 16-17 (CHAPPUIS, 1923; BORUTZKY, 1927) 6:293-295 24: 4 *55. Maraenobiotus affinis 1903 _31: 487-492, pl. 27, figs 6-25 = Maraenobiotus affinis Daday, 1903 32: 337-342 (BORUTZKY, 1952) 25: 8-9 = Phyllognathopus viguieri (Maupas, 1892) 26: 37-38, fig. 16, a-e (GURNET, 1920, 1932) *57. Nitocra paradoxa 1903 31: 492-497, pl. 27, figs 26-40 = Schizopera paradoxa (Daday, 1903) pl. 28, figs 41-48 (CHAPPUIS, 1931) 32: 325, 342-346 *58. Nitocra platypus 1906 36: 192- 195, pi. 15, figs 10, 14-26 = Nitocra platypus Daday, 1906 _37: 273-277 (LANG, 1948) 59. Onychocamptus 1903 33: 157- 161, pl. 1, figs 18-24 = Onychocamptus Daday, 1903 (LANG, 1948) 60. Onychocamptus heteropus 1903 3L 497-502, pi. 28, figs 49-65 = Onychocamptus mohammed 32 : 325 (Blanchard and Richard, 1891) 33: 157-161, pl. 1, figs 18-24 (ZTKOFF, 1904) *61. Ophiocamptus mongolicus 1906 38:59-62 = Moraria mongolica (Daday, 1906) 44:309-314, fig. 8, 1-19 (LANG, 1948) Table 3 is a list of the Copepoda material of the DADAY collection in the Hungarian Natural History Museum. DADAY studied the material of several foreign collectors, thus it is highly possible that there are materials of taxa DADAY described in several European museums, particularly in Germany. The Copepoda collection in Budapest is divided into two parts: alcoholic (294 tubes) and mounted specimens (370 slides). It includes material of 47 taxa described by DADAY. Unfortunately, many slides are in poor condition. The material has been registered in either of several ways. One type of registering was made by DADAY, but a considerable part of the collection which was purchased by the Hungarian Natural History Museum was numbered in a different fashion by E. DUDICH, curator of the collection at that time, and finally some of the material had not been given definite registration numbers at all. In preparation of the catalogue first the name of the taxon and that of the author is given as labelled by DADAY, then follows the current valid name of the taxon. The phrase "manuscript name" was used to indicate unpublished names. The following item is the number of slides, tubes and specimens contained, after these the localities are listed according to the labelling of DADAY. Hungarian localities are indicated by "H" to separate them from those of other countries. This indication was used for localities of Hungary belonging to the period of DADAY. The differences in registering mentioned above necessitated the introduction of a new, uniform registering of the whole material. Both types of registering are given, the former numbers indicated by "D" and after semicolon followed the new numbers. The whole string of numbers are enclosed in parentheses.
