Marisia - Maros Megyei Múzeum Évkönyve 27/2. (2003)

Arheologie

24

MIHAI PETICÄ. APAI EMESE

stylistical analyses of this material, dating in the Bronze Age, cannot help to separate it by different cultures of this period like late Wietenberg, Noua or Cehälut grup, and from numerical point of view, the Wietenberg pottery overhelmed the pottery which has similarities with the Cehälut and Noua decorating style.

At this stage of research, in the absence of any information concerning the archaeological context, the study of this material is based on the analogy offered by the sites such as Obreja, Cicäu, Bädeni, Palatca, Vi§tea, Mähäceni, Sibiu, Alba lulia, Pianu de Jos, etc. The result suggest that we have a cultural horizon, which is characteristic by the increase of the contacts, or even a mixture of populations in the Late Bronze Age.

Until a more precise dating based on archaeological context, we may suggest that this pottery should be chronologically framed between Late Bronze Age I and beginning of the Late Bronze Age II.

Abrevieri bibliografice

I. Andritoiu, Contributa la cunoa§terea culturii Andritoiu 1978 Otomani din sud-vestul Transilvaniei, ín ActaMN, XV,

’______________________________1978, p.63-84.___________________

I. Andritoiu, Contributii la cunoa§terea culturii Andritoiu 1986 Noua ín sud-vestul Transilvaniei, in Thraco-Dacica, VII,

______________________________1986, p.31-45.___________________

I. Andritoiu, Contributii la cunoa§terea culturii Andritoiu 1987 Wietenberg in sud-vestul Transilvaniei, in Sargetia, XX,

___________________________1986-1987, p.45-63._________________

I. Andritoiu, Civilizatia tracilor din sud-vestul Andritoiu 1992 Transilvaniei in epoca bronzului, Bibliotheca

_____________________________Thracologica, II, Bucure$ti, 1992.___________

. . M . I. Andritoiu, T. Mari§, Räspändirea culturii Otomani

П r'iQQn an^ 'n sud'vestul Transilvaniei, in Symposia Thracologica,

__________________________1990, p.114-115.__________________

.. ... I. Andritoiu, V. Vasiliev, Cäteva consideratu privind

ndn.oiu- as! lev cultura Noua in Transilvania, in Apulum, XXVÍI-XXX,

_______________________1990-1993, p.121-146.________________

. T . I. Bajusz, D. Tamba, Contributii la topográfia

Bajusz- am a arheologicä a väii Some§ului. Sectorul Cäpilna-Jibou, in

____________________Acta MP, XII, 1988, p.91-120._____________

I. Bejinariu, Consideratu privind sfar§itul culturii Bejinariu 2001 Wietenberg la vest de M-tii Mese§, in RevBistritei, XV,

______________________________Bistrita-Násáud, 2001, p.21-32.____________

AI. Bogdan, Date noiprivind ansamblul cetätii din Bogdan 1967 Tärgu Mure§, in Studii§i Materiale, II, Tg-Mure§, 1967,

________________________________________p.79-91.______________________

ffk 1QQ4 N. Boroffka, Die Wietenberg -Kultur. Ein Betrag

_°oro a_________zur Erforschung der Bronzezeit in Südosteuropa, Bonn,