Magyar News, 1991. szeptember-1992. augusztus (2. évfolyam, 1-12. szám)

1992-01-01 / 5. szám

MägkärNews Monthly Publication in Cooperation of the local Hungarian Churches & Organization HAPPY NEW YEAR BOLDOG ÚJÉVET Rev. Dr. Alexander Fuleki: CURRENT STATE OF OUR HUNGARIAN CULTURE In the last 30 years the Hungarian com­munities in North America have been hard pressed to maintain and perpetuate our dis­tinct Hungarian cultural heritage. Even though the first and second group of Hun­garians have assimilated into the American culture, one would think that the constant influx of Hungarian immigrants during the last three decades would have facilitated the process. It did not happen, however. Few of us realize that there are four different Hungarian mental and cultural outlooks represented in North America. Prior to these, it was difficult to perpetuate the Hungarian heritage, but not an impossi­bility. At the early part of the century, Hungarian populations in large clusters made the task a considerably easier pro­cess. Also, the "melting pot" philosophy was not emphasized at that time as an effort to Americanize. Ethnic communities could flourish having their business, cultural cen­ters and families speaking their native lan­guage at home. But as the second and third generation Hungarians came along, the dis­tinctive ethnic characteristics have slowly diminished, and the American cultural traits began to dominate. With this development, there was the inevitable struggle between the old time purists, who wanted to see the Hungarian culture flourish and the following genera­tion (the sons, daughters and their chil­dren), who disconnected themselves from the Hungarian culture almost completely. In this struggle and for the failure to keep our Hungarian culture (identity), the churches and their elected ministers are blamed. For 60-70 years, it was one of the main tasks of the local church to foster cultural heritage. The church was both the spiritual haven and the cultural center. To­day, sad to say, the cultural aspect has almost disappeared (also damaging the spiri­tual), but not the controversy which still calls for our churches to be cultural centers as well. I want to look at this issue briefly; and even though the solutions suggested may not be acceptable to all, it is, nevertheless, an attempt to offer some directions out of our present chaos. Perhaps it would be much easier to main­tain our cultural heritage, in spite of the rapid technological changes and social up­heavals, if the Hungarian population in North America would be characterized by the same social and mental background. But as it is, over the last 90 years, we have four distinct Hungarian groups living in this country. The first was the influx of the farmers. There were over one million who came here between 1900-1926. They had limited or no education, but they were deeply reli­gious and family-centered. They built our present religious and cultural monuments and through their life helped to maintain them. Their cultural activities included plays in the church basements, cooking, baking, noodle making, some dances, and a variety of fund raising projects with Hungarian flavor added. They were too busy working long hours for their living, but in their free times all their activities were centered around the church. The second group is comprised of the so-called DP’s - “displaced persons,” who came here during and around WWII. They were the upper middle class, the educated, and the nobility. They were also committed to the family, but religion to them was an instrument or situation to further their own cause. They loved the church, and respected the minister, but church support, church attendance, and a regular Christian fellow­ship were not the daily or weekly part of their lives. They attended on major holi­days and took Communion regularly. Some even became officers in the church, but they stayed aloof from the religious-cul­tural heritage established between 1900- 1950. These Hungarians had their own cultural heritage which may be characterized as urbanized or imported. Theirs included the opera, concerts, soirees, formal dances, for­mal house parties, and even their card game was different. They played tarokk and bridge, the card game of the upper class. Since the educated and the nobility did not associate with the peasants in Hungary, it stands to reason that they stayed away from each other here in America, too. The third group is labeled the 56-ers. They were those who lived under commu­nist rule and came after the 1956 Revolu­tion. They represented a vastly different Hungarian culture in that they were not allowed to think in terms of the pre-WW II Hungarian setting, and they were daily ex­posed to a de-Hungarianization process. This included replacing the Hungarian names and historical landmarks with Rus­sian names, words and monuments. They were de-cultured from 1949-1956 so they felt no affinity either to the farmer class or to the DP’s. After they came to America, some have joined the church but too many stayed away and even fewer participated in Hungarian (Continued on page 3)

Next

/
Thumbnails
Contents