Magyar Hírek, 1988 (41. évfolyam, 1-22. szám)

1988-05-06 / 9. szám

Children were the subject of a number of articles in our previous is­sue. One discussed statistical data re­lating to the number of births, an­other analysed the situation of moth­ers and children from many aspects. László Garami confronted two points of view in his article: that of the demographer, who comments on the facts from the point of view of population trends and that of a mother, who stopped working a year ago to be able to devote all her time to the care of her child. András Klinger, Head of the Department of Vital Statistics in the Central Statisti­cal Office said that 210-220 children should be born to each one hundred families to ensure the replacement of the population, but in fact no more than 17(M80 are bom. Consequently Hungary has had a deficit in this re­spect since the sixties. Nevertheless, since the early eighties the prime rea­son of the population decline has been the high death rate, and not the decline in the number of births. Were the death rate as low in Hun­gary as in neighbouring Austria then a population growth could be ex­pected. The other subject of the arti­cle, the mother, in essence confirms what the statistician observed, her second child was bom in the fif­teenth year of her marriage, a full de­cade after her first-born daughter. The reason for the long gap was pro­fessional pressure—she was working on her doctoral dissertation—and the smallness of their home, which they exchanged for a larger one only recently. In the meantime a new sys­tem of child care allowance had been introduced. Now mothers can stay at home for two years past their mat­ernity leave receiving 75 per cent of the wages earned earlier. Indeed, she is entitled to have one more year of leave and receive the ordinary child care allowance, which is usually less than what she received in the first two years. The young mother with her first-born daughter Nobody suggests, naturally, that the problems are solved. Éva Árok­­szállási’s moving report on children living in state institutions documents some of the problems. For many years now the number of children in state care—for which the blame lies mostly with the parents—has been around thirty thousand, but the num­ber of children living in insecure conditions is several times higher. Unfortunately the situation has been aggravated also by organizational er­rors: the National Council for the Protection of Children and Young People was disbanded in 1962 and childcare was entrusted to the local councils in consequence of which the running of children’s institute could not be coordinated and a building programme proceded with­out a general plan. The capacity of these institutes increased by only 3000 places between 1960 and 1980 while the number of the state wards increased by ten thousand. Improve­ment is expected from some new measures, such as family protection centres, the setting up of an official network of foster-parents, raising the allowance paid for each foster-child, and easing the procedure of adop­tion. Another article deals with the Bat­­tonya children’s village. Joseph von Ferenczy, the Hungarian-born Mu­nich press-magnate donated the in­itial capital to build this village, then the Hermann Gmeiner Foundation made another contribution. The vil­lage was built by 1986 and since then children and their foster-parents have moved in. The article is about the youngest of the families there, which moved in only six weeks be­fore. It consists of a young woman teacher and four children. The child­ren happen to be brothers and sisters who had earlier been housed in dif­ferent institutions a long way from each other. Now they are at last to­gether in the children’s village and live in a normal family community. The village is not yet fully occupied. Ultimately some 80-100 children will live there in family communities si­milar to the one described. Further children’s villages will be opened in the near future at Kecskemét and Százhalombatta. Close-up from Australia An estimated fifty thousand peo­ple of Hungarian birth live on the fifth continent, which is only about 0.3 per cent of the sixteen million strong population of the country, yet the presence of Hungarians seems much greater that that particularly in Sydney, writes György Halász. György Halász visited several Hungarian associations and commu­nities. (According to the Guide of Ethnic Community Organizations published in 1987 a total of 74 Hun-The St. George Budapest Soccer Club garian associations and clubs are re­gistered in Australia.) The Mel­bourne congregation of the Inde­pendent Hungarian Reformed Church helps new arrivals and main­tains a home for the elderly. The club of St George, a Sydney suburb, runs a football team, a 3,000 capacity football ground and it organizes re­gular meetings and functions. Of the 7,600 members of the Hakoah club some 2,500-3,000 are Hungarians. That club was founded in 1938 by Austrian Jewish sports enthusiasts. The Hungarian Historic Society ar­ranges lectures on various periods and events of the Hungarian history, and publishes the journal Magyar Mull. In Adelaide two Hungarian as­sociations exist with opposing politi­cal views. György Halász names a number of Hungarians, who have achieved suc­cess in Australia with hard work. Se­lections from the story of Sir Peter Abeles are given in English on these pages. Hungarian culture abroad In the Hungarian part of this issue András Lukácsy comments on the fact that works of the Hungarian cul­ture are increasingly penetrating for­eign countries. Their echo is still not what is expected, but this is partly the result of our linguistic isolation partly the consequence of—as Lu­kácsy puts it — “still insufficient self-propaganda”. He mentions Hun­garian fine arts as an example of the latter, which is still insufficiently known. No more than one or two Hungarian painting can be seen in the great museums of the world (and even fewer statues), even thought many works of Hungarian artists can claim a place amongst the best of the world on the grounds of their aes­thetic value. There are, however, real achievements also. The Hungarian score is best in the field of music­writes Lukácsy—, thanks first of all to the fame of Liszt, Bartók and Kodály, but the works of contempor­ary Hungarian composers—Ligeti, Sándor Veress, Kurtág—are also known and performed all over the world, while Hungarian singers, pi­anists, violinists are always welcome in the concert halls. A few works of the “Hungarian school” of film art hallmarked with the names of Mik­lós Jancsó and István Szabó reaped success all over the world. The lin­guistic isolation handicaps the most the spread of Hungarian literature. Various translation programmes, such as those of the PEN Club, the Writers’ Federation and the publish­ers offering anthologies, endeavour to gradually break through this. Cultural life and finances “How much money would be ne­cessary to support cultural activities in Hungary?” Antal Stark, Secretary of State at the Ministry of Culture, was asked, after having offered the information that about 15 1/2 thou­sand million forints are allocated from various state funds to the sup­port of cultural activities, other than education, from theatres to film­­making and from book-publishing to libraries, and that this money is far from enough. “We would be in trou­ble if we had to answer this question concretely—Antal Stark said, adding that in fact, a new system of finan­cing must be worked out. State sup­port for culture will be restricted to those activities which affect basic cultural needs. All other facets of cultural life should become self-fi­nancing by their public or main­tained by some method of sponsor­ship. “The fact itself that the state continues to support a certain selec­tion of cultural activities implies a kind of censorship”—István Balázs, the interviewer asked. “Such a dang­er really would exist if the authori­ties defined which activity received state support and which did not,”— Antal Stark answered—“this is why I suggest that the distribution of state support should be decided upon by autonomous bodies—artists’ associa­tions and the like. It must be assured of course, that these bodies should not be biased themselves.” As a con­sequence of the diminishing state support for what is really valuable the cultural market is overran by thrash, according to many notable critics—István Balázs added. “An economic constraint of profitability undeniably exists”—Antal Stark answered, adding that the unsuffi­cient cultural standards of the masses are the reason why there is such a mass demand for thrash. A change for the better can be hoped for only from a more efficient system of education. zoltán HALÁSZ 29

Next

/
Thumbnails
Contents