Braun Tibor, Schubert András (szerk.): Szakértői bírálat (peer review) a tudományos kutatásban : Válogatott tanulmányok a téma szakirodalmából (A MTAK Informatikai És Tudományelemzési Sorozata 7., 1993)

EUGENE GARFIELD: Refereeing and Peer Review. Part 1. Opinion and Conjecture on the Effectiveness of Refereeing

13 GARFIELD: REFEREEING AND PEER REVIEW, PART 1 12. . Reducing the noise level in scientific communication: how services from ISI aid journal editors and publishers. Ibid.

, 1980. Vol. 3. p. 187-8. 13. Amlry P. Refereeing for JORS J. Oper. Res. Soc. 34:1025-6. 1983. 14. Znckennan H & Merton R K. Patterns of evaluation in science: institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva 9:66-100, 1971. [Reprinted as: Institutionalized patterns of evaluation in science. (Merton R K.) The sociology of science. Chicago, EL: University of Chicago Press, 1973. p. 460-%.) 15. Garfield E. Has scientific communication changed in 300 years? Op. cit.. 1981. Vol. 4. p. 394-400. 16. Kronick D A. Authorship and authority in the scientific periodicals of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Libr. Quart. 48:255-75, 1978. 17. —, A history of scientific & technical periodicals. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1976. 336 p. 18. — ——. Literature of the life sciences: reading, writing

. research. Philadelphia: ISI Press. 1985. 219 p. 19. Day R A. How to write and publish a scientific paper. Philadelphia: ISI Press. 1983. p. 82. 20. Christiansen D. Peer review reviewed. IEEE Spectrum 18:21. 1981. 21. Hamad S. Personal communication. 25 June 1986. 22. — . Commentary on "Computer-assisted referee selection as a means of reducing potential editorial bias" by H. Russell Bernard. Behav Brain Sei. 5:202, 1982. 23. Bishop C T. How to edit a scientific journal. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1984. p. 53. 24. Hamad S. Commentary on "Peer review and the Current Anthropology experience" by C. Belshaw. Behav. Brain Sei. 5:201, 1982. 25. Gordon M. Running a refereeing system. Leicester, UK: Primary Communications Research Centre. University of Leicester. 1983. 56 p. 26. Hamad S. Creative disagreement. Sciences 19(7): 1820, 1979. 27. Baflar I C & Patterson K. journal peer review: the need for a research agenda. N. Engl. J. Med. 312:654-7, 1985. 28. Lock S. Utter to P.B.S. Fowler. 4 December 1984. Brit. Med. J. 290:1560, 1985. 29. Yalow R S. Radioimmunoassay: a probe for the fine structure of biologic systems. Science 200:1236-45, 1978. 30. Beison S A, Yalow R S, Bauman A, Rothschild M A & Newerty K. Insulin-I

13

1 metabolism in human subjects: demonstration of insulin binding globulin in the circulation of insulin treated subjects. / Clin. Invest. 35:170-90, 1956. 31. Wilson I D. Peer review and publication. /. Clin Invest. 61:1697-701, 1978. 32. Kronick D A. Personal communication. 20 June 1986. 33. Stossel T P. Speed: an essay on biomedical communication. N. Engl. J. Med. 313:123-6, 1985. 34. Grouse L D. The Ingelfinger rule. JAMA

—J Am. Med. Assn. 245:375-6, 1981. 35. Hollender M H. Authors, editors and referees. J. Clin. Psychiat. 40:331, 1979. 36. Beaver D D. On the failure to detect previously published research. Behav. Brain Sei. 5:199-200, 1982. 37. Merlon R K. The Matthew effect in science. Science 159:56-63, 1968. (Reprinted in: The sociology of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 1973. p. 439-59.) 38. Foi B. Peer review and the public's right to know: a look at the Ingelfinger Rule. Med. Commun. 12:33-7, 1984. 39. Broad W I. Imbroglio at Yale (I): emergence of a fraud. Science 210:38-41, 1980. 40. Wachsllcht-Rodbard H, Gross H A, Rodbard D, Ebert M H & Roth I. Increased insulin binding to erythrocytes in anorexia nervosa. N. Engl. J Med. 300:882-7. 1979. 41. Jones R. Rights, wrongs and referees. New Sei. 61:758-9, 1974. 42. Frmenkel-Conrat H. Utter to editor. (Is anonymity necessary?) Nature 248:8, 1974. 43. Michel F C. Solving the problem of refereeing. Phys. Today 35(12):9; 82, 1982. 44. Garfield E. Negative science and "The outlook for the flying machine." Opt. cit., 1980. Vol. 3. p. 155-72. 45. Newcomb S. The outlook for the flying machine. Independent 55:2508-12. 1903. 46. Honig W M. Science's Miss Lonelyhearts. Sciences 24<3):24-7, 1984. 47. B

uaeman O. Citation Classic. Commentary on Phys. Rev. 115:503-17, 1959. Current Contents/Engineering. Technology & Applied Sciences 1

5(37): 16, 10 September 1984. 48. Llneweaver H. Citation Classic. Commentary on / Amer. Chem. Soc. 56:658-66. 1934. Current Contents/Life Sciences 28(11):19, 18 March 1985. 49. Definition of "sole contribution." N. Engl. J. Med. 281:676-7, 1%9.