Braun Tibor, Bujdosó Ernő (szerk.): A tudományos kutatás minősége (A MTAK Informatikai És Tudományelemzési Sorozata 4., 1984)

II. KÜLFÖLD - 2. Az alapkutatási tevékenység értékelése B. R. Martin és /. Irvine

II.2. AZ ALAPKUTATÁSI TEVÉKENYSÉG ÉRTÉKELÉSE* 15. E. Garfield: Citation indexes in sociological and históriai research, Amer. Docum., 14, (1963) No. 4, 29. 16. E. Garfield: Citation indexing for studying science,Nature, 227 (1970) 669. 17. E. Garfield: Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation, Science, 178 (1972)471. 18. E. Garfield: What scientific journals can tell us about scientific journals. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication PC16, No. 4 (1973) 200. 19. E. Garfield: Citation and distinction,Nature, 242 (1973) 485. 20. G. N. Gilbert, S. Woolgar: The quantitative study of science: An examination of the literature, Sei. Stud., 4 (1974) 279. 21. H. Inhaber, K. Przednowek: Quality of research and the Nobel Prizes, Soc. Stud. Sei., 6 (1976) 33. 22. J. Irvine, B. R. Martin: The economic effects of Big Science: The case of radio astronomy. Proceedings of the International Colloquium on the Economic Effects of Space and Other Advanced Technologies, Strasbourg, 28-30 April 1980 (Ref. ESA SP-151, Paris, 1980, 103. old.). 23. N. C. Janke: Abuses of citation indexing, Science, 156 (1967) 892. 24. N. Kaplan: The norms of citation behaviour: Prolegomena to the footnote, Amer. Docum., 16 (1965) 179. 25. T. S. Kuhn: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970. 26. J. Larabi: Mesure de l'efficacité des laboratoires de recherche fondamentale sélectionnes par le Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales, Revue Francaise d'Informatique de Recherche Operationelle, 3 (1969) 103. 27. J. Larabi: Note sur 1 efficacité des laboratoires de recherche fondamentale sélectionnes par le CNES, Le Progres Scientifique, 137 (1970) 4. 28. S. M. Lawani: Citation analysis and the quality of scientific productivity, Bioscience, 27 (1977) No. 1, 26. 29. D. Lindsey: Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: The problem of multiple authorship,Soc. Stud. Sei., 10(1980) 145. 30. J. Maddox: Is the literature worth keeping? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 19 (1963) No. 9,14. 31. J. Margolis: Citation indexing and evaluation of scientific papers, Science, 155 (1967) 1213. 32. B. R. Martin: Cognitive and Social Locations: Their Role in the Processes of Discovery and Evaluation within Science, Department of Liberal Studies in Science, Manchester University, mimeo 1977. 33. A. J. Matheson: Centres of chemical excellence? Chemistry in Britain, 8 (1972) 207. 34. A. J. Meadows, J. G. O Connor: Bibliographical statistics as a guide to growth points in science, Sei. Stud., 1 (1971)95. 35. J. D. McGervey: Citation analysis, Science, 183 (1974) 28. 36. I. I. Mitroff, D. E. Chubin: Peer review at the NSF: A dialectical policy analysis, Soc. Stud. Sei., 9(1979) 199. 37. M. J. Moravcsik: Measures of scientific growth, Res. Policy, 2 (1973) 266. 38. M. J. Moravcsik: A progress report on the quantification of science, J. Sei. Ind. Res. (India), 36 (1977)195. 39. M. J. Moravcsik, P. Murugesan: Some results on the function and quality of citations, Soc. Stud. Sei., 5 (1975) 86. 40. M. J. Moravcsik, P. Murugesan: Citation patterns in scientific revolutions, Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 161. 41. C. R. Myers: Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology,Amer. Psychol, 25 (1970) 1041. 42. National Institute of Economic and Social Research. Natl. Inst. Econ. Rev., 86 (1978) Table 25. 43. Is your lab well cited? Nature, 227(1970)219. 44. More games with numbers, Nature, 228 (1970) 698. 45. University of Houston expels professor, Nature, 279 (1979) 278. 46. A. L. Porter: Citation analysis: Queries and caveats. Soc. Stud. Sei., 7 (1977) 257. 47. D. J. D. Price: Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press, New York, 1963.