Neparáczki Endre (szerk.): Magyar őstörténeti műhelybeszélgetés - A Magyarságkutató Intézet Kiadványai 20. (Budapest, 2020)
Gáll Erwin – Fülöp Réka: A Kárpát-medencei honfoglalás kor régészeti kutatásának stádiuma. Régészeti források alapján levonható következtetések
A KÁRPÁT-MEDENCEI HONFOGLALÁS KOR RÉGÉSZETI KUTATÁSÁNAK... A. Male graves A.l. Male graves, group 1: the rich/richer warrior graves, among them the so-called “princely burials”, respectively the group of the “sabretache-group” graves (characterized by sabres with gold- or silver fittings, sabretache plates or sabretaches with mounted ornaments, belts decorated with mounts, fitted bow cases, caftans with mounted ornaments, trappings, or partial horse burials) A.2. Male graves, group 2: burials with modest inventories (simple lockrings, frequently bow components, sometimes sabres, partial horse burials or trappings); B. Female graves B. Female graves, group 1: the earliest female burials, just like males, have simple inventories. This group was named earlier as “graves with harnesses decorated with rosette-shaped mounts”. It is characterized by the following finds; drop earrings with pendant spheres, cast openwork braid discs, beads, rosette-shaped harness ornaments, partial horse burials or trappings). B. 2. Female graves, group 2: these burials are featuring more affluent grave goods than the previous ones. This group is characterized by exquisite silversmith artefacts, such as discoid braid ornaments, pendant fittings, lozenge-shaped shift ornaments, caftans adorned with metal ornaments (rectangular and round mounts), sheet metal bangle with a twirled ending, and beads. However, on the base of the archaeological data, one can suppose the integration/structural integration of the native peoples in the Carpathian Basin, and besides, further inner migration processes during this century. However, the details of these processes (how quick, and to what extent were the structural integration and subsequent the acculturation observable), separately in the case of every community or microregion (for example the nature of the relationships between the populations of the large and the small funerary sites; the possibility the interpretations of the funerary sites without weapons and horse burials), can be continued and further investigated only by including scientific analyzes. KEYWORDS: 10th century, archaeology of the Hungarian conquest, weaponhorse burials, structural integration, native people 167
