Istvánovits Eszter (szerk.): A nyíregyházi Jósa András Múzeum Évkönyve 55. (Nyíregyháza, 2013)
A 2010. október 11-14. között Nyíregyházán és Szatmárnémetiben megtartott Vándorló és letelepült barbárok a kárpáti régióban és a szomszédos területeken (I-V. század) Új leletek, új értelmezések című nemzetközi régészeti konferencia anyagai - Marcin Biborski - Piotr Kaczanowski: Mágikus kardcsüngők
The Huns on Polish lands — an attempt to summarise element in the burial inventory is a golden earring. The above-mentioned finds offer no grounds for establishing their precise chronology. All we may say is that they come from the period spanning circa 70 years between the moment when the Huns settled in the Carpathian Basin and their defeat on the Nedao river. Thus, the finds date generally to the early phase of the Migration Period, as does the warrior burial from Przem^czany. Only two of the finds that revealed connections with the Hunnic state can be given more accurate chronology: the grave from Jakuszowice and the hoard from Swilcza. In the first case, it seems justified to date it no later than the early-430’s. This is suggested by stylistic analysis of the artefacts, especially those typical of the Untersiebenbrunn-Sösdala horizon (Godlowski 1995. 156). The hoard from Swilcza should be dated only slightly later, as indicated by dendrochronological analyses (433 +10). Therefore, contrary to the occasionally expressed views, there is no reason to date the Hun-related finds from the Polish soil to the times of the Attila’s reign, except perhaps for the Swilcza hoard. Unlike the chronology, the interpretation of the discussed finds has been given much more attention. This applies first of all to the grave from Jakuszowice, which for most scholars studying the Huns is the primary or even the only source for reconstructing the relations between the Huns and the population north of the Carpathians. Among the proposed interpretations are such that regard this grave as a Hunnic burial, or a burial of a representative of a higher social class, connected with the Huns, of local or perhaps foreign origin (Lowmianski 1963. 273, Godjowski 1985. 155). There is no doubt that the Lichnov, Bruntál district (after Bríza-Janáková 2010.) 9. kép Lichnov, Bruntál járás (Bríza-Janáková 2010. alapján) 441 Fig. 8 Razová, Bruntál district (after Tejral 2000.) 8. kép Razová, Bruntál járás (Tejral 2000. alapján)
