Majorossy Judit (szerk.): A Ferenczy Múzeum Évkönyve 2014 - Studia Comitatensia 33., Új Folyam 1. (Szentendre, 2014)

Szentendre. Adalékok a Pajor család, a Pajor-kúria és a Ferenczy-család történetéhez - Martos Gábor: Két talált kép „megtisztítása”. Ferenczy Valér ismeretlen nagybányai művei egy magyarországi magángyűjteményből

Studia Comitatensia 2014 - Yearbook of the Ferenczy Museum - New Series 1 - English Summaries

of loose housing groups. The whole residential area, taking into account the data of field surveys, did not exceed two kilometres in diameter, and the houses, like cells, made up a larger unit. These traces have not carried the marks of the later villages in the classical sense, such as the stable, consistent subdivision, as the internal image of the settlements became regulated only after the appearance of the plot system. The number of residential structures established in the close proximity and probably used in the same time was up to four-five per site, thus one is compelled to evaluate these units as villages. The group of households belonging to a village, which were continuously moving and could be located hundreds of metres from each other, can be defined with the analysis of the contemporary geographical conditions, the water facilities, the age, spread and intensity of the finds and the position of the possible parish church (Plate 9). Árpád Age villages actually consisted of groups of farmsteads, but while the households were built repeatedly, withered and moved continuously, the temporal and spatial extent of the village itself was much more stable, even centuries-lasting.

269