A Debreceni Déri Múzeum Évkönyve 1986 (Debrecen, 1987)

Természettudomány - Juhász, Lajos–Bozsko, Szvetlana: The Ornithofauna of Debrecen II. Synecological Analysis

EARLY NEOLITHIC (Starcevo culture) Lánycsók (Zoffmann, 1978) 31. Lánycsók 1 Divostin (unpublished) 32. Divostin 1 Lepenski Vir (unpublished) 33. Lepenski Vir 8 34. Lepenski Vir 14 35. Lepenski Vir 29 36. Lepenski Vir 32a 37. Lepenski Vir 35 38. Lepenski Vir 48 39. Lepenski Vir 54d 40. Lepenski Vir 54e 41. Lepenski Vir 68 42. Lepenski Vir 83a 43. Lepenski Vir 88 4. Results The results can be surveyed by the cluster trees (Figures 1 and 2) composed on one hand by the original (unweighted) metric data and on the other hand by the metric data weighted by the heritability. For the first glance it is string that in the cluster tree made by the weighted measurements the distances between the single individuals are usually smaller. Significant differences can be also experienced between the find-connections of the cluster tree. First and foremost each chronological and civilizational components of the sample show more systematical distinctions in the light of heritability. In the upper part of the cluster tree composed by the weighted measurements the finds of the Mesolithic Lepenski Vir culture concentrate stronger. This is primarily called forth by the fact that the mixed subcluster signed 1-1-2-1 of the cluster tree composed by the unweighted measurements takes a position in the environment of the Mesolithic finds, while in the cluster tree made by the weighted measurements the same subcluster takes another position, after the mixed clusters and connected with the Early Neolithic finds (2-1-1 subcluster). At the same time the Mesolithic grouping of the subcluster 1-2-2-1 of the unweighted cluster tree and the finds No. 2 and 3 of the above subcluster get transferred to another subcluster (1-1-2-1-2-1). In the weighted cluster tree the Mesolithic grouping is followed by mixed groups in which, descending lower and lower, the proportion of the finds of the Mesolithic Lepenski Vir culture lessens and lessens. In the lowest part of the cluster tree it is only Early Neolithic finds that group. The composition of the subclusters signed 1-1-1, 1-2-1 and 2-2 in the unweighted cluster tree remain unchanged in the weighted cluster tree. The comparison of the cranial finds' clustering made by two aspects can be also carried out by the determination of the find-joinings which came about at a given distance level. During our attempt two levels of this kind were marked out: levels 0.25 and 0.5. Besides, the affinity of the skulls to each other, i.e. their grouping in the cluster tree, can be evaluated 79