Alba Regia. Annales Musei Stephani Regis. – Alba Regia. Az István Király Múzeum Évkönyve. 20. 1980 – Szent István Király Múzeum közleményei: C sorozat (1983)

Tanulmányok – Abhandlungen - Éry Kinga, K.: Comparative statistical studies on the physical anthropology of the Carpathian basin population between the 6–12th centuries A. D. p. 89–141.

In addition, in the case of Virt the mutually primary relationship between the two samples may be indicative of the Avar Period population's continuity. Similarity with group С from the Period of the Hungarian Conquest may also be explained with the common East European past. On the other hand, it is also possible that the Rusovce population as a Slavic group and the people of group С reached the Carpathian Basin simultaneously. Szatymaz-Vasútállomás (No. 117; subcluster 1/a, Figure 74). The greater part of this population is entirely Europoid, the proportion of Euro-mongoloids is approximately 1 percent. Analogies: the Árpád Period Cegléd (No. 106), Csatalja (No. 107) and Kardoskút (No. 112). Fig. 74: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Szatymaz History: the Szatymaz population may have formed somewhere within the distribution area of subcluster 1/a. All of its analogies belong to this subcluster. Székesfehérvár-Bikasziget (No. 118; subcluster 2/a, Figure 75). The greater part of this population is Europoid. Euromongoloids make up approximately 2 percent of the sample. Analogies : the 9—11th century A. D. Tankeevka from the Middle Volga river region (No. 40), the 11—12th century A. D. Kairy from the Northern Pontic region (No. 56) and the Avar Period Homokmégy (No. 80). Fig. 75: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Székesfehérvár— Bikasziget History: according to its position within subcluster 2/a the Székesfehérvár—Bikasziget population may have formed in the steppe belt east of the Dnepr river. Two later analogies from the east locate this area more accurately at the European side of the steppe belt (See Figure 25; Figure 76). The Avar Period analogy for this sample is in a secondary position, and as such it should rather be regarded as a sign of common steppe origin than that of continuity. Fig. 76: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Tankeevka Székesfehérvár-Szárazrét (No. 119; subcluster 2/a, Figure 77). This sample is entirely Europoid. Analogies: the 7—4th century В. C. "Sauromatian" sample (No. 22), the 4—9th century A. D. Skalistoe from the Northern Pontic region (No. 57), the 10—11th century A. D. Sarkel II by the Don river (No. 54), the 9th century A. D. "western Slavic" Mikulcice (No. 73), the Avar Period Kékesd (No. 82), and Toponár (No. 93), grouç "B" from the Period of the Hungarian Conquest (No. 100), the Árpád Period Ábrahám (No. 103), Devin (No. 108) and Rusovce (No. 116). Fig. 79: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Zalavár History: the analogies and membership in subcluster 1/b both suggest that the Zalavár population may have formed in the East European parkland area and perhaps in the forest steppe belt, subsequently developed in an eastern Slavic environment. As it was detailed, the analogy with the Nitra-Lupka population is based on a primary connection which may be indicative of a direct ethnic relationship. During the analysis of the Zalavár population it turned out that one must also reckon with a probably Germanic component as is suggested by the similarity between this population and that of the Jura sample (Figure 80). Resemblance to group С of the conquering 116 Fig. 77: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Székesfehérvár— Szárazrét History: due to its position in subcluster 2/a the Székesfehérvár — Szárazrét population may have formed somewhere in the steppe belt east of the Dnepr river, perhaps near to the Don bend {Figure 78). According to the analogies however, it is likely that elements characteristic of subcluster 1/a were mixed with this population following its" arrival into the Carpathian Basin. Fig. 78: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Sarkel II Zalavár-Kápolna (No. 120, subcluster 1/b, Figure 79). This population is entirely Europoid. Analogies: the 3rd century В. C. — 3rd century A. D. Late Scythian Period Zolotaya Balka (No. 29) and Neapol (No. 30) from the Northern Pontic region, the 9—13th century A. D. "eastern Slavic" "Dregovichians" (No. 59), "Polyans" (No. 61) and "Radimichians" (No. 63), the 4—7th century A. D. "western Germanic" Jura population (No. 66), the Avar Period Tiszaderzs (No. 92), the 9th century A. D. Nitra-Lupka (No. 98), and group С from the Period of the Hungarian Conquest (No. 101).