Petres Éva, F.: Neolithic graves at Bicske - István Király Múzeum közelményei. A. sorozat 9. (Székesfehérvár, 1959)

23. F. Tobipa: op. cit. 37, Table XXV, 10—12.

24. I. Kutziân: op. cit. 64, XXXII, 5, 7, XXXIII, 6—9, etc.

25. Tiszapolgár—Basatanya, tomb 5, í. Kutziân, Arch. Ért. (1946—48) 43, 47, XIII. 9, XV, 8; Kenézlő, F. Tompa: loc. cit. (1934—35) Table 12, 4.

26. J. Banner: loc. cit. Table VII, 7, 11.

27. J. Banner: loc. cit. 15.

28. F. Tompa: loc. cit. (1934—35) 3.; J. Csalog: FA 5 (1945) 4.

29. J. Banner—M. Párducz: loc. cit. 29.

30. F. Tompa: Bp. tört. 1 (1942) 18-.; J. Banner: loc. cit. (1950) 13.

31. J. Csalog: FA 3/4 (1944) 15.; J. Banner: loc. cit. (1950) 15.; V. Milojcic: loc. cit. 122-.

32. V. Milojcic: loc. cit. 123.

33. F. Tompa: loc. cit. (1934/35) 32.; S. Gallus: loc. cit. 85-.; F. Tompa: loc. cit. (1942) 26-., III. 1—4; J. Banner: Dóig 19 (1943) 292.; J. Banner: loc. cit. (1950) 7-.; V. Milojcic: loc. cit. 122.; M. Garasanin: BRGK 33 (1943—50) 130.

34. Collection of data of Hungarian National Museum No. I. 16. — Report of Professor A. Horváth.

35. The map of the survey of area made in the surroundings of Szob in 1949 shows six neolithic camps in the Duna — Ipoly bend. — HNM No. I. 44.

36. This manner of burial is found in the Körös culture, I. Kutziân: op. cit. 96.; it also occurs in the culture of the line decorated pottery. J. Skutil: loc. cit. 37.

37. The find spot is mentioned: F. Tompa: loc. cit. (1934—35) 30-., 45.; F. Tompa: loc. cit. (1942) 18-.; J. Banner: Dolg 19 (1943) 229.; J. Csalog: FA 3/4 (1941) 14-.; V. Milojcic: loc. cit. 122-.

38. Diary of excavations of the Hungarian National and Municipal Museums for the year 1932 — HNM B III, 160.

39. F. Tompa: loc. cit. (1934—35) Table 13, Fig. 12.

40. I. Brunner: SzSz 5 (1935) 62.-; I. Brunner: A lovasberény-alsótelki (Guba-domb) őstelep emlékei. (Relics of the primitive settlement of Lovasberény-Alsótelek (Guba hill), Manuscript.

41. I. Brunner: op. cit. II. 4.

42. On the ground of so little material we cannot assert that this manner of decoration would have been brought about under the influence of the Körös culture, since it is also being applied on vessels belonging to the culture of line decoration (I. Kutziân: op. cit. 131). More recent research, however, believes to have in some of its varieties the first appearence of the influence of the Great Plain in Transdanubia. (J. Banner: loc. cit. [1950] 10-.; J. Csalog: Arch. Ért. 2 [1941] 6.)

43. Rescuing of relics by the Székesfehérvár István Király Museum (King Stephen Museum) in 1950. Report of R. Pusztai on the excavations.

44. R. Pusztai assumes it to belong to the Lengyel culture, on account of the above pieces and of a red painted fragment of the settlement.

45. We cannot share the opinion of F. Tompa who sees the influence of Lengyel pottery in the Bicske material (F. Tompa: loc. cit [1942] 27). In fact, prior to this supposition, F. Tompa himself believed in a mixture of the Tisza culture. (F. Tompa: loc. cit. [1934—35] 31.)

13