Janus Pannonius Múzeum Évkönyve 14-15 (1969-70) (Pécs, 1974)

Régészet - K. Zoffmann, Zs.: Anthropological Analysis of the Cemetery at Zengővárkony and the Neolithical Lengyel Culture in SW-Hungary

ANTHROPOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF LENGYEL CULTURE 59 gin or the population of the Lengyel culture. The significant similarity with the Bohemian Corded Pottery series (which as J. CHOCHOL (1964) states may be considered on the basis of its taxonomic overall picture as fully indenti­cal with the Bohemian autochton neolithic — eneolithic population) justifies the assumption that according to its taxonomic characteristics the population of the Lengyel culture is a fun­damentally Central European population where besides important Cromagnon elements the Me­diterranean type dominates. The significant similarity of the anthropologic series from the cemetery of Cernica and Cernavoda which be­long to the Boian respectively to the Hamangia cultures, proves the connection of the Lengyel culture with the Northern Balkans, i.e. the in­termingling of the Central European original inhabitants with populations from the Nor­thern Balkans. The degree of intermingling bet­ween the autochton inhabitants and the new populations coming from South may be judged by the differences of the three fragmentary ce­meteries of the Lengyel culture which are known till now. This hypothesis based on the results of the anthropological studies is supported by the findings of the archeological researches accor­ding to which the Lengyel culture was develo­ped by the Linearceramic people from Central Europe, but was subject to strong southern in­fluences. These archeological evidences (KA­LICZ 1967 MAKK A Y 1967) indicate that the mentioned southern influences may be traced back to the Vinca culture, ie. through it to Anatolian prehistoric cultures. This assumption is in agreement with the results obtained by the comparison of the anthropologic series which point to a close relationship between the population of Lengyel and the population of Boian culture which in its turn stands near to the Northern Balkan Vinca culture. 7 At the sa­me time the anthropological comparison of the prehistoric populations of the more southern territories extending as far as Anatoly which, according to archeological studies played an equally important role in the development of the Lengyel culture, shows no closer relation­ship between theese populations and those of Lengyel. This participation in the development of the Lengyel culture seems rather indirect 7 The only anthropological series of the Vinca culture (9 male skeletons) excavated at the site Vinca, is not yet published. SCHWIDETZKY (1967) found that this fragmentary series presents signi­ficant similarities with the anthropologic material of the neolithic cultures on the Balkans and in Greece. for the time being as judged by the very mini­mal anthropologic material actually at our dis­posal. 8 8 I should like to express here my thanks to J. Nemeskéri and K. K. Éry for their valuable advice and the reading of this paper, to G. Bandi for his help in archeological problems, to S. Kerpel-Frónius for the translation, and to K. Nándor for the pho­tographic work. I am particularly indebted to A. Thoma for his explanations and advice concerning the biométrie methods i.e. their practical application. REFERENCES ALEKSEEV, V. P. 1969 — Proiskhozdenie narodov Vostochnoj Evropy (Kraniologischeskoe issledovanie). (Moskva) ALEKSEEV, V. P.—DEBEC, G. F. 1964 — Kraniometria. (Moskva) ANGEL, J. L. 1944 — A Racial Analysis of the Ancient Greeks: An Essay on the Use of Physical Types. Am. J. of Phys. Anthr. 2:329—376. 1951 — Troy: The Human Remains. (Cincinatti) BACH, H. 1964/65 — Beitrag zur Anthropologie der Glocken­becherleute. Alt-Thüringen 7:208—227. BANDI, G. 1970 — Die Lengyel Kultur in Ungarn. Fundamen­ta. Reihe A, Band 3. Die Anfänge des Neo­lithikums vom Orient bis Nordeuropa. II. (Köln—Graz) BARTUCZ, L. 1966 — A praehistorikus trepanáció és orvostörté­neti vonatkozású sírleletek (Prehistoric trephining and unearthed skeletons with bearings on medical history). Palaeopatho­logia III. (Budapest) BUNAK, V. V. 1961 — Neolithische Schädel typen Ost- und West­europas und ihre vergleichende Charakte­ristik. Anthrop. Közl. 5:21—38. CHOCHOL. J. 1964 — Antropologické materiály z novych vyzku­mû neolitu a doby bronzove v Cechah. Crania Bohemica 1. 1964a — Antropologické materiály к nővé koncepci Ceskeho pravëku: Neolit a autochtoni eneo­lit. — Anthropologischen Matériáién zur Konzeption der böhmischen Vorzeit: Neo­lithikum und Aeneolithikum. AR 16:565— 573, 573. 1968 — Die anthropologische Untersuchung der prähistorischen ethnischen Beziehungen in der Tschechoslowakei. VII me Congres In­ternational des Sciences Anthropologiques et Ethnologiques, Moscou, 1964. 111:216— 218.

Next

/
Thumbnails
Contents