Szabó János szerk.: Fragmenta Mineralogica Et Palaentologica 24-25. 2007. (Budapest, 2007)

3

rd group (specimens re-inventoried on the basis of the remnants of old inventory cards and on some papers) Family Deinotheriidae BONAPARTE, 1845 Genus Deinotherium KAUP, 1829 Deinotherium cf. proavum EICHWALD, 1835 (Plate I: 1-6) Material — Six specimens. Measurements — L dext. fr. (Gyn/391., Plate I: 3): length of the fragment: 212 mm, min. and max. diameter at the proximal end: 71.8 mm, 87.7 mm; min. and max. diameter at the distal end: 55.2 mm, 64.9 mm; P

3 dext. (Gyn/393., Plate I: 4): length: 75.85 mm, max. width: 63 mm; P4 sin. (Gvn/392., Plate I: 5): length: 86.3 mm, max. width: 70.45 mm; M

2 sin. fr. (Gyn/387., Plate I: 2): length: cca. 88 mm, max. width: cca. 88 mm; M

2 sin. (Gyn/390., Plate I: 1): length: 89.7 mm, max. width: 90.30 mm; M

3 dext. (Gyn/402., Plate I: 6): length: 93.5 mm, max. width: 93.2 mm. Remarks — The inventory cards of the specimens lost in 1956, except one. I found a small piece of the burnt inventory- card on a left maxilla fragment with M

2 sin. (Gyn/390., Plate I: 1). On the card the first part of the name of the locality: "Abauj" was discernible. I found references on some Deinotherium giganteum remains from Abaújszolnok (KOVÁCS 1863, KOCH 1900). The above mentioned six specimens (M

2 sin., M

3 dext., P3 dext., P4 sin., M2 sin. fr., 1

2 dext. fr.) belonged very probably to the same animal, so I think all the remains are from Abaújszolnok. The age of the remains is unknown. The measurements of the teeth are larger than those of typical Deinotherium giganteum teeth (see below). The crown morphology- of the P3 is also closer to the D. proavum than to the D. giganteum because of the sharper ectolophid and the more elongated entoconid (see in GASPARIK 2001, Plate I: 3 and 8). Family Gomphotheriidae HAY, 1922 Genus Anancus AYMARD, 1855 Anancus arvernensis (CROIZET & JOBERT, 1828) (Plate IV: 5) Material — Single specimen. Remarks — The specimen is an M

3 sin. fragment Measurements — Length of the fragment: 111.20 (Gyn/397.) in the material. Based on the remnant of its mm, width at the third loph: 81.3 mm. old inventory card its locality

7 is Pestszentlőrinc, its age is unknown. 4

th group (specimens re-inventoried without any older data) Family Gomphotheriidae HAY, 1922 Gomphotheriidae sp. indet. (Plate I: 7) Material — A tusk fragment (Gyn/389.). Measurements — Length of the fragment: 193.2 mm, min. and max. diameter on its proximal end: 64.5 mm, cca. 80 mm. Remarks — The specimen shows the so-called "guillochage" structure. Based on its shape and the wear facets the specimen is a fragment of a lower incisor of a gomphothere. Its measurements suggest that the specimen is probably Tetralophodongigantorostris (KLAHN, 1922). Explanations to Plate III Mammut horsoni Mammut horsoni Mammut horsoni Mammut horsoni Mammut horsoni Mammut horsoni I HAYS, 1834 — M

3 sin. (V 93.6); Szabadka (Subodca); age unknown; x 0.5. " HAYS, 1834 — M

3 dext. fr. (V 93.7); Salgótarján; Pliocene; x 0.5. ' HAYS, 1834 — left mandible fragment with broken 1M3 sin. (V 93.9); Ajnácskő (Hajnácka); Kate Pliocene, MN 16; X 0.33. HAYS, 1834 — left mandible fragment with M;, sin. (Gyn/386.); locality and age are unknown; x 0.33. ' HAYS, 1834 — AT sin. fr. (Gyn/394.); locality and age are unknown; x 0.5. ' HAYS, 1834 — M

3 dext. fr. (Gyn/396.); locality and age are unknown; x 0.5. Anancus arvernensis (CROIZET & JOBERT, 1828) — M

2 dext. fr. (Gyn/401.); locality and age are unknown; x 0.5. Mammut horsoni HAYS, 1834 — M

3 dext. (Gyn/395.); locality and age are unknown; X 0.5.