Szabó János szerk.: Fragmenta Mineralogica Et Palaentologica 20. 2002. (Budapest, 2002)
18 HÍR, J. & N bottom of the mesosinus (C). In some molars the ectoloph is complettely missing (A, Figure 10: 3-4). Ectoloph—mesoloph connection is found in 3 molars (A, Figure 10: 6). The mesoloph is mainly small (C, Figure 10: 1), or middle developed (B, Figure 10: 6). Long mesoloph (A, Figure 10: 4) is found only in one molar. Table 10 — Data of Megacricetodon minor M 1 molars from Sámsonhaza. — Abbreviations: L = length; W = width; AA = ant/cone; BB = labial ant/phule; CC = ectoloph; DD = mesoloph; EE = ectlph.-mslph. connection no. L W AA BB CC DD 1 EE figure 1/9 1.62 1.05 B B2 B C B Fig. 10: 1 1/10 1.55 1.05 B Bl B C B 4/20 1.55 3.98 B C A C B Fig. 10: 3 4/21 1.48 B B2 A c B 4/22 1.54 0.98 B Bl B B B 4/23 1.50 0.98 B C B B B 4/24 1.48 0.91 B Bl A C B 4/25 1.61 0.98 B Bl B B B 4/26 1.53 0.95 B C B C B 4/27 1.61 0.98 B C B A B Fig. 10: 4 4/34 1.4S 0.97 B Bl B B B 4/35 1.61 1.01 B Bl C B A 4/36 1.48 0.94 B Bl C B A 4/37 1.60 0.98 B B2 B B B 99/1 1.48 0.97 B C C B A Fig. 10: 6 99/2 1.58 1.05 B c B C B Fig. 10: 2 99/3 1.57 0.99 B Bl B B B 99/4 1.55 0.97 B Bl B B B 99/6 1.58 1.01 B B2 B C B Fig. 10: 5 L W n. 19 18 tain. 1.48 0.91 max. 1.64 1.05 X 1.55 0.98 Table 11 — Data of Megacricetodon minor M 2 molars from Sámsonháza. — Abbreviations: L - length; W = width; AA - protolophule; BB ectoloph; CC - mesoloph; DD - metalophule. no. L 1 W AA BB CC DD figure 1/11 1.16 1.02 B C B B 1/12 1.18 0.98 A B B B 1/13 1.12 0.91 strongly worn 4/28 1.23 0.97 A B B A Fig. 10: 7. 4/38 1.13 0.90 A A B B 99/12 1.19 0.98 A C B A Fig. 10: 10. 99/13 1.20 0.99 A B A A Fig. 10: 8. 99/14 1.12 0.91 A C A E Fig. 10: 9. 99/15 1.13 0.87 B B B A L W n. 9 9 min. 1.12 0.87 max. 1.23 1.02 X 1.16 0.95 M 2 (Figure 10: 7-10) — The labial and the lingual anterocingulum are equally developed, but the fosse beliind the labial one is deeper. The protolophule connected to the anterolophule in front of the protocone (A, Figure 10: 7) or connected to the protocone (B, Figure 10: 8.). The posterior ectoloph of the paracone is short (B, Table 7: 10.), or longer, reaching the bottom of the mesosinus (C, Figure 10: 9). In on case the ectoloph is completely missing (A). The mesoloph is long in some cases (A, Figure 10: 9-10), but mainly medium developed (B, Figure 10: 8). ROS, L. GY M 3 (Figure 10: 11) — Two molar were found and one of them is suitable for description. In the anterior portion of the molar the labial anterocingulumprotocone-protolophule-paracone system is visible. In the posterior portion the hypocone partially melted into the cingulum. The metacone is very small. Table 12 — Data of Megacricetodon minor M J molars from Sámsonháza. — Abbreviations: L = length; W - width. no, L W figure 4/30 0.8 0.77 Fig. 10: 11 99/27 0.78 0.76 0.79 0.765 Figure 10 — 1-6: Occlusal surfaces of Megacricetodon minor M 1 molars; 7(reversed)-8(reversed)-9-10(reversed): Occlusal surfaces of Megacricetodon minor M 2 molars; 11: Occlusal surface of Megacricetodon minorM 3 ; 12: Occlusal surface oiEumyarion médius mi. mi (Figure 11: 1-6) — The anteroconid is simple (A/1, Figure 11: 2-4), two-parted (A/2, Figure 11: 1), or threeparted (A/3, Figure 11: 5-6), but never divided by furrow(s). The A/2 type is found in strongly worn spécimens. The anterolophulid is simple (A, Figure 11: 1), or complicated by short lingual and labial spurs (B, Figure 11: 4). In the third type the anterolophulid is V- or Y-shaped. The main branch is situated between the anteroconid and the protoconid, the other one starts from the basis of the main branch and reaches the anterolabial cingulum (C, Figure 11: 2-3, 6). The mesolophid is short (C, Figure 11: 6), or medium developed (B, Figure 11: 3-4), but never reaches the lingual margin of the crown.
