Vörös A. szerk.: Fragmenta Mineralogica Et Palaentologica 17. 1994. (Budapest, 1994)

F mesolophe -, parametalophule mesostyle +, entostyle G mesolophe +, parametalophule mesostyle +, entostyle total 10% 1 2% 42 100% M3 (Figs. 17, 21) On the crowns of the molars there are not any accessory elements with statistic occurrence Dimensions: L Wa min - max. 1.15-1.4 1.04-1.19 N: 24 X 1.27 1.11 SD 0.06546 0.04947 Fig. 7.' Cricetinus europaeus Ml molar (no. 10). with small, remnant mesolophe ml (Figs. 4, 10, 13, 22) The mesial (anterior) surface of the teeth is smooth. The anteroconid is mainly undivided (69 %) or weakly divided. In the latter case the division is visible only on the distal (posterior) surface of the anteroconids. The well developed anterolophulid is rare. In the most cases it is indistinct (does not emerge from the level of the anterosinusid) or missing. If the anterolophulid is developed it can be connected with the labial or with the lingual part of the anteroconid and in one case it is doubled. The mesolophid and mesostylid are missing. The terminal part of the posterolophuhd is slightly broadening out. Dimensions: L Wa Wp min.-max. 1.76-2.10 0.59-0.84 1.05-1.21 N: 67 X 1.89 0.70 1.13 SD 0.07225 0.06383 0.03671 Fig. 8. Cricetinus beremendensis Ml molar (no. 3/2) Morphological distribution A ACD undivided, ALPLD weak B ACD weakly divided, ALPLD weak C ACD undivided, ALPLDD ACD weakly divided, ALPLD well developed E ACD weakly divided, ALPLD F ACD undivided, ALPLD well developed Total 13 18% 2 2% Fi

8- 94 5% Cricetinus 72 100% europaeus M2 molar (Holotypus)