Vörös A. szerk.: Fragmenta Mineralogica Et Palaentologica 17. 1994. (Budapest, 1994)

1989 Platanus fraxinifolia (John, et Gilm.) Waither; Hably, p. 87, pl. 3, fig. 6; pl. 4, figs. 5, 6; Fig. 46. Material; 86.43.1., 86.115.2., 86.116.2., 86.117.1., 86.118.1., 86.119.1., 86.120.1., 86.121.1., 86.122.1., 86.123.2., 86.124.1, 86.126.1, 86.127.2, 86.128.1, 86.129.1., 86.130.2, 86.131.2, 86.132.1, 86.133.2, 86.134.1, 86.135.1, cf.86.136.1. ,86.137.1, 86.138.1, 86.296.1, 86.300.2, 86.301.1, 86.315.1, 86.361.1, cf.86.362.1, 86.368.1, 86.370.1, cf.86.388.1, 86.400.1, cf.86.406.1, 86.415.1, 86.457.2, 86.462.1, 86.494.1, 86.631.2, 86.638.1, 86.639.1, 86.661.1, 86.666.1, cf.86.670.1, cf.86.673.1, 86.680.1. Description: Complete compound leaves with three leaflets were rarely found. Generally single leaflets appeared in the locality. Length of leaflets 3.5 - 8.5 cm, width 0.6 - 2.0 cm. Apex and base acute, base slightly asymmetrical. Shape of the lamina is lanceolate, vena­tion camptodromous. Midvein strong, secondary veins are thin, margin toothed. Teeth are very small, sharp, apex of teeth acute. Discussion: Leaflets of P. fraxinifolia show great similarity to the leaves of P. nep­tuni. Sometimes, especially at the big leaflets of P. fraxinifolia, distinguishing the two species is very difficult. The greatest difference between the two species is in the character of the teeth. While P. neptuni has obtuse teeth apex, the teeth apex of P. fraxinifolia is acute. The distances between the teeth is greater at P. neptuni, than at P. fraxinifolia. The toothed part of the margin of P. fraxinifolia is longer than that of P. neptuni, in other words, the margin of P. neptuni is toothed only in the apical part or two-third part of the leaves, but never at the basal part. Nevertheless, there are some remains, which could belong to either of the two species. Until now, P. fraxinifolia is known from Hungary only in Egerian floras, e. g. Verőcemaros (Hably 1982), Kesztölc (Hably 1988) and Nagysáp (Hably 1989). Rosaceae Rosa L. Rosa lignitum Heer, 1869 (Pl. 23, fig. 7) 1869 Rosa lignitum Heer; Heer, p. 99, pl. 30, fig. 33. 1885 Rosa lignitum Heer; Engelhardt, p. 369, pl. 26, fig. 11, 12. 1885 Rosa bohemica Engelhardt; Engeln, p. 369, pl. 25, figs. 10, 12. 1971 Rosa bohemica Engelhardt; Buzek, p. 61, pi. 24 , tigs. 1-19. 1976 Rosa bohemica Engelhardt; Buzek, Holy & Kvacek, p. 101, pi. 9, figs. 6-8, pi. 15, figs. 5, 6. 1978 Rosa lignitum Heer; Mai & Walther, p. 101, pi. 4, figs. 8-10, pi. 40, figs. 3-10. 1990 Rosa lignitum Heer; Hably, p. 33, pi. 29, fig. 3. Material; 86.466.1. Description: One leaflet was found in the locality. Length of lamina 0.9 cm width 0.5 cm. Shape ovate, apex acute, bae cordate, margin densely toothed. Teeth are compound. Tooth apex and sinuses are acute. Venation craspedodromous, secondary veins end in the teeth apices. Discussion: This species is present in many Tertiary floras of Europe. In the Egerian floras of Hungary (e. g. Vértesszőlős, Hably 1990) it appears as a rare accessory element.

Next

/
Thumbnails
Contents